“Maybe I made up the whole thing”: placebos and patients’ experiences in a randomized controlled trial // Culture, medicine and psychiatry. 2009. September. Vol. 33. № 3. P. 382–411.
Kienle G. S., Kiene H. The powerful placebo effect: fact or fiction? // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1997. Vol. 50. № 12. P. 1311–1318.
Brown-Sequard C. E. The effects produced on man by subcutaneous injections of a liquid obtained from the testicules of animals // Lancet. 1889. July 20. Vol. 2. P. 105–107.
Cussons A. J., Bhagat C. I., Fletcher S. J., Walsh J. P. Brown-Séquard revisited: a lesson from history on the placebo effect of androgen treatment // The Medical Journal of Australia. 2002. December. Vol. 177. № 11. P. 678–679.
Matfin G. The rejuvenation of testosterone: philosopher’s stone or Brown-Séquard Elixir? // Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism. 2010. August. Vol. 1. № 4. P. 151–154.
Conway A. J., Handelsman D. J., Lording D. W., Stuckey B., Zajac J. D. Use, misuse and abuse of androgens. The Endocrine Society of Australia consensus guidelines for androgen prescribing // The Medical Journal of Australia. 2000. March 6. Vol. 172. № 5. P. 220–224.
Clark W. C., Mehl L. Thermal pain: A sensory decision theory analysis of the effect of age and sex on d’ various response criteria, and 50% pain threshold // Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1971. Vol. 78. № 2. P. 202–212.
Lewis S. C., Warlow C. P. How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials // Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. Vol. 75. № 2. P. 181–187.
Hofer A., Hummer M., Huber R., Kurz M., Walch T., Fleischhacker W. W. Selection bias in clinical trials with antipsychotics // Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2000. December. Vol. 20. № 6. P. 699–702.
Hodges R. D., Scofield A. M. Is spiritual healing a valid and effective therapy? // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1995. Vol. 88. № 4. P. 203–207.
Abbot N. C., Harkness E. F., Stevinson C., Marshall F. P., Conn D. A., Ernst E. Spiritual healing as a therapy for chronic pain: a randomized, clinical trial // Pain. 2001. Vol. 91. № 1–2. P. 79–89.
Miller L. E., Stewart M. E. The blind leading the blind: Use and misuse of blinding in randomized controlled trials // Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2011. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 240–243.
Misra S. Randomized double blind placebo control studies, the “Gold Standard” in intervention based studies // Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS. 2012. July-December. Vol. 33. № 2. P. 131–134.
Jadad A. R., Enkin M. W. Randomized controlled trials: questions, answers, and musings. Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
George S. L. Perspectives on scientific misconduct and fraud in clinical trials // Chance. 1997. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 3–5.
Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Hayes R. J., Altman D. G. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials // JAMA. 1995. Vol. 273. № 5. P. 408–412.
Steneck N. H. Assessing the Integrity of Publicly Funded Research. A Background Report for the ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity. 2000.
George S. L., Buyse M. Data fraud in clinical trials // Clinical investigation. 2015. Vol. 5. № 2. P. 161–173.
Woodhead M. 80% of China’s clinical trial data are fraudulent, investigation finds // BMJ. 2016. Vol. 355: i5396.
Djulbegovic B., Lacevic M., Cantor A., Fields K. K., Bennett C. L., Adams J. R. et al. The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research // Lancet. 2000. August 19. Vol. 356. P. 635–638.
Lexchin J., Bero L. A., Djulbegovic B., Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review // BMJ. 2003. Vol. 326. P. 1167–1170.
Davidson R. A. Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials // Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1986. May. Vol. 1. № 3. P. 155–158.
Medical Research Council. Clinical trial of patulin in the common cold // Lancet. 1944. September 16. Vol. 244. № 6316. P. 373–375.
Carneiro A. V. Bias in clinical studies // Revista portuguesa de cardiologia. 2011. February. Vol. 30. № 2. P. 235–242.
Raistrick H., Birkinshaw J. H., Michael S. E., Bracken A., Gye W. E. et al. Patulin in the common cold. Collaborative research on a derivative of Penicillium patulum Bainier // Lancet. 1943. November 20. Vol. 245. P. 625–635.
Stansfeld J. M., Francis A. E., Stuart-Harris C. H. Laboratory and clinical trials of patulin // Lancet. 1944. September 16. P. 370–372.
Clarke M. The 1944 patulin trial of the British Medical Research Council // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2006. September. Vol. 99. № 9. P. 478–480.
D’Arcy Hart P. A change in scientific approach: from alternation to randomised allocation in clinical trials in the 1940s // BMJ. 1999. August 28. Vol. 319. № 7209. P. 572–573.
Balabanova Y., Coker R., Fedorin I., Zakharova S., Plavinskij S., Krukov N. et al. Variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among Russian clinicians and implications for screening programmes: observational study // BMJ. 2005. August 13. Vol. 331. № 7513. P. 379–382.
Regev A., Berho M., Jeffers L. J., Milikowski C., Molina E. G. et al. Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection // American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2002. Vol. 97. P. 2614–2618.
Cooperberg M. R., Chi T., Jad A., Cha I., Turek P. J. Variability in testis biopsy interpretation: implications for male infertility care in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection // Fertility and sterility. 2005. September. Vol. 84. № 3. P. 672–677.
Elmore J. G., Nelson H. D., Pepe M. S., Longton G. M. et al. Variability in pathologists’ iterpretations of individual breast biopsy slides: A population perspective // Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016. Vol. 164. № 10. P. 649–655.
Smith-Bindman R., Hosmer W. D., Caponigro M., Cunningham G. The variability in the interpretation of prenatal diagnostic ultrasound // Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2001. April. Vol. 17. № 4. P. 326–332.
Mussurakis S., Buckley D. L., Coady A. M., Turnbull L. W., Horsman A. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast // The British journal of radiology. 1996. November. Vol. 69. № 827. P. 1009–1016.
Physical defects: The pathway to correction. New York: American Child Health Association 1934.
Ayanian J. Z., Berwick D. M. Do physicians have a bias toward action? A classic study revisited // Medical Decision Making. 1991. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 154–158.
Boylston Z. An account of the small-pox inoculated in New England, upon all sorts of persons, whites, blacks and of all ages and constitutions. The Second edition. London: Printed for S. Chandler. Reprinted in Boston in NE for S. Gerrism in Cornhil and T. Hancock, 1730.
Torgerson D. J., Roberts C. Randomisation methods: concealment // BMJ. 1999. August 7. Vol. 319. № 7206. P. 375–376.
Schulz K. F. Subverting randomization in controlled trials // JAMA. 1995. November 8. Vol. 274. № 18. P. 1456–1458.
Julious S. A., Mullee M. A. Confounding and Simpson’s paradox // BMJ. 1994. December. Vol. 309. № 6967. P. 1480–1481.
Charig C. R., Webb D. R., Payne S. R., Wickham J. E. Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy // British Medical Journal. (Clinical research ed.). 1986. March 29. Vol. 292. № 6524. P. 879–882.
Kunz R., Vist G., Oxman A. D. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials // The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2007. April. Vol. 18. № 2, MR000012.
Antman K., Amato D., Wood W., Carson J., Suit H., Proppe K. et al. Selection bias in clinical trials // Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1985. August. Vol. 3. № 8. P. 1142–1147.
Vickers A. J. How to randomize // Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology. 2006. Vol. 4. № 4. P. 194–198.
Suresh K. P. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research // Journal of human reproductive sciences. 2011. January-April. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 8–11.
Beller E. M., Gebski V., Keech A. C. Randomisation in clinical trials // Medical Journal of Australia. 2002. Vol. 177. № 10. P. 565–567.
Porter T. M. The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton University Press, 1986.
Fisher R. A. The arrangement of field experiments // Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture of Great Britain. 1926. Vol. 33. P. 503–513.
Nolan D., Speed T. Stat Labs: Mathematical statistics through applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.
Fisher R. A. Mathematics of a lady tasting tea / J. R. Newman (ed.), The world of mathematics (Third Ed., 1512–1521). New York: Simon and Schuster, 1956. P. 1512–1521.
Finney D. J. Sir Ronald Fisher’s Contributions to Biometric Statistics // Biometrics. 1964. Vol. 20. № 2. P. 322–329.
Fisher R. A. The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1960.
Hróbjartsson A., Gøtzsche P. C., Gluud C. The controlled clinical trial turns 100 years: fibiger’s trial of serum treatment of diphtheria // BMJ. 1998. Vol. 317. № 7167. P. 1243–1245.
Hall N. S. R. A. Fisher and his advocacy of randomization // Journal of the history of biology. 2007. Summer. Vol. 40. № 2. P. 295–325.
Kennedy A., Torgerson D. J., Campbell M. K., Grant A. M.