35. Liedert A., Kaspar D., Blakytny R. et al. Signal transduction pathways involved in mechanotransduction in bone cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Oct 13;349(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.214. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/16930556 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
36. Smith L.R, Cho S., Discher D.E. Stem Cell Differentiation is Regulated by Extracellular Matrix Mechanics. Physiology (Bethesda). 2018 Jan 1;33(1):16–25. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00026.2017. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212889 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
37. Collier T.A., Nash A., Birch H.L., de Leeuw N.H. Preferential sites for intramolecular glucosepane cross-link formation in type I collagen: A thermodynamic study. Matrix Biol. 2015 Oct;48:78–88. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.06.001. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/26049074 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
38. Sell D.R., Biemel K.M., Reihl O. et al. Glucosepane is a major protein cross-link of the senescent human extracellular matrix. Relationship with diabetes. J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 1;280(13):12310-5. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500733200. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/15677467 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
39. Lederer M.O., Buhler H.P. Cross-linking of proteins by Maillard processes-characterization and detection of a lysine-arginine cross-link derived from D-glucose. Bioorg Med Chem. 1999 Jun;7(6):1081-8. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(99)00040-1. www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10428377 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
40. Panwar P., Butler G.S., Jamroz A. et al. Aging-associated modifications of collagen affect its degradation by matrix metalloproteinases. Matrix Biol. 2018 Jan;65:30–44. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.06.004. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28634008 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
41. Naresh M.D., Brodsky B. X-ray diffraction studies on human tendon show age-related changes in collagen packing. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Jul 31;1122(2):161-6. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(92)90319-9. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1643089 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
42. Nikolaeva T.I., Tiktopulo E.I., Il’yasova E.N. & Kuznetsova S.M. Collagen type I fibril packing in vivo and in vitro. Complex Systems Biophysics. Biophysics 2007;52:489–497. link.springer.com/article/10.1134 %2FS0006350907050065 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
43. Streeter M., Goddard T.N., Crawford J.M. and Spiegel D.A. Identification of Glucosepane Cross-Link Breaking Enzymes. Diabetes 2018 Jul; 67(Suppl): – . https:// doi.org/10.2337/db18-1229-P (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
44. Hallengren E., Almgren P., Engstrom G. et al. Fasting levels of high-sensitivity growth hormone predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: the Malmo Diet and Cancer study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 7;64(14):1452-60. doi: 10.1016/j. jacc.2014.03.063. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25277616 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
45. O’Leary D.H., Polak J.F., Kronmal R.A. et al. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 7;340(1):14–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400103. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9878640 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
46. Chambless L.E., Heiss G., Folsom A.R. et al. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987–1993. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Sep 15;146(6):483-94. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009302. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9290509 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
47. Chambless L.E., Folsom A.R., Clegg L.X. et al. Carotid wall thickness is predictive of incident clinical stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 1;151(5):478-87. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010233. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10707916 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
48. Fedintsev A., Kashtanova D., Tkacheva O. et al. Markers of arterial health could serve as accurate non-invasive predictors of human biological and chronological age. Aging (Albany NY). 2017 Apr;9(4):1280–1292. doi: 10.18632/aging.101227. www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28455973 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
49. Van den Munckhof I.C.L, Jones H., Hopman M.T.E. et al. Relation between age and carotid artery intima-medial thickness: a systematic review. Clin Cardiol. 2018 May;41(5):698–704. doi: 10.1002/clc.22934. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29752816 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
50. Lorenz M.W., Bickel H., Bots M.L. et al. Individual progression of carotid intima media thickness as a surrogate for vascular risk (PROG-IMT): Rationale and design of a meta-analysis project. Am Heart J. 2010 May;159(5):730–736.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.02.008. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20435179 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
51. Den Ruijter H.M., Peters S.A., Anderson T.J. et al. Common carotid intimamedia thickness measurements in cardiovascular risk prediction: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012 Aug 22;308(8):796–803. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9630. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/22910757 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
52. Bots M.L., Witteman J.C., Grobbee D.E. Carotid intima-media wall thickness in elderly women with and without atherosclerosis of the abdominal aorta. Atherosclerosis.
1993 Aug;102(1):99-105. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(93)90088-c. www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/8257458 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
53. Taylor A.J., Bindeman J., Le T.P. et al.Progression of calcified coronary atherosclerosis: relationship to coronary risk factors and carotid intima-media thickness. Atherosclerosis. 2008 Mar;197(1):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.05.027. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17727858 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
54. Gronewold J., Bauer M., Lehmann N. et al. Coronary artery calcification, intimamedia thickness, and ankle-brachial index are complementary stroke predictors. Stroke. 2014 Sep;45(9):2702-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005626. www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/25116876 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
55. Amato M., Montorsi P., Ravani A. et al. Carotid intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasound as surrogate of coronary atherosclerosis: correlation with quantitative coronary angiography and coronary intravascular ultrasound findings. Eur Heart J. 2007 Sep;28(17):2094-101. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm244. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/17597051 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
56. Bots M.L., Hofman A., Grobbee D.E. Common carotid intima-media thickness and lower extremity arterial atherosclerosis. The Rotterdam Study. Arterioscler Thromb.
1994 Dec;14(12):1885-91. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.14.12.1885. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/7981175 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
51. Allan P.L., Mowbray P.I., Lee A.J., Fowkes F.G. Relationship between carotid intimamedia thickness and symptomatic and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease. The Edinburgh Artery Study. Stroke. 1997 Feb;28(2):348-53. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.2.348. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9040688 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
58. Cohen G.I., Aboufakher R., Bess R. et al. Relationship between carotid disease on ultrasound and coronary disease on CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Nov;6(11):1160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.06.007. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/24229768 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
59. Ogata T., Yasaka M., Yamagishi M. et al. Atherosclerosis found on carotid ultrasonography is associated with atherosclerosis on coronary intravascular ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Apr;24(4):469-74. doi: 10.7863/ jum.2005.24.4.469. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15784765 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
60. Bots M.L., Baldassarre D., Simon A. et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and coronary atherosclerosis: weak or strong relations? Eur Heart J. 2007 Feb;28(4):398–406. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl482. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17277033 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
61. Bots M.L., Evans G.W., Tegeler C.H., Meijer R. Carotid Intima-media Thickness Measurements: Relations with Atherosclerosis, Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Application in Randomized Controlled Trials. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jan 20;129(2): 215-26. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.173500. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26830994 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
62. Freire C.M., Ribeiro A.L., Barbosa F.B. et al.Comparison between automated and manual measurements of carotid intima-media thickness in clinical practice. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5:811-7. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19812693 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
63. Peters S.A., den Ruijter H.M., Palmer M.K. et al. Manual or semi-automated edge detection of the maximal far wall common carotid intima-media thickness: a direct comparison. J Intern Med. 2012 Mar;271(3):247-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2796.2011.02422.x. www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21726301 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
64. Kanters S.D., Algra A., van Leeuwen M.S., Banga J.D. Reproducibility of in vivo carotid intima-media thickness measurements: a review. Stroke. 1997 Mar;28(3): 665-71. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.3.665. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9056629 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
65. Bots M.L., Mulder P.G., Hofman A. et al. Reproducibility of carotid vessel wall thickness measurements. The Rotterdam Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;47(8): 921-30. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90196-1. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7730896 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
66. O’Leary D.H., Polak J.F., Wolfson S.K. Jr. et al. Use of sonography to evaluate carotid atherosclerosis in the elderly. The Cardiovascular Health Study. CHS Collaborative Research Group. Stroke. 1991 Sep;22(9):1155-63. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.9.1155. www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1926258 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).
67. Riley W.A., Barnes R.W., Applegate W.B. et al. Reproducibility of noninvasive ultrasonic measurement of carotid atherosclerosis. The Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Plaque Study. Stroke. 1992 Aug;23(8):1062-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.8.1062 www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1636178 (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).