Благодарности
При написании этой книги я влез в неоплатные моральные долги по отношению как к организациям, так и к отдельным лицам – историкам и философам науки. Клер Холл с факультета истории и философии науки Кембриджского университета я благодарен за то, что она предоставила мне возможность для первых научных исследований, а факультету истории и философии университета Индианы – за то, что там мне дали возможность продолжить эти исследования. Среди множества людей, делившихся со мною знаниями по биологии XIX века, особого упоминания заслуживают Питер Боулер, Джо Берчфилд, Уильям Байнум, Фредерик Б. Черчилль, Фрэнк Эджертон, Питер Готри, Майкл Гислин, Джон К. Грин, Джордж Гринелл, Сандра Герберт, Винсент Каваловски, Малькольм Коттлер, Камилла Лимож, Эрнст Майр, Рой Портер, Мартин Радвик, Сидней Смит, Мэри П. Виндзор и Роберт M. Янг. Особенно теплых слов благодарности заслуживают Джонатан Ходж и Дэвид Халл, постоянно меня критиковавшие, но и постоянно ободрявшие. Не смею надеяться на то, что два таких независимых мыслителя, как они, безоговорочно примут все мною написанное, но хочется думать, что эта книга, возможно, заслужит их одобрение наличием общего для нас всех архетипа.
Особая благодарность Джуди Мартин, напечатавшей несколько черновых рукописей этой книги, и Элис Суэйн, взявшей на себя обременительную задачу по редактированию рукописи. Спасибо вам всем!
Библиография
Abbott, E., and Campbell, L. 1897. The life and letters of Benjamin Jowett, M.A. London: Murray.
Adamson, J. W. 1930. English education, 1789–1902. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Agassiz, L. 1840. On the development of the fish in the egg. In Report of the tenth meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, p. 129. London: Murray.
Agassiz, L. 1842. On the succession and development of organized beings at the surface of the terrestrial globe, being a discourse delivered at the inauguration of the Academy of Neuchatel. Edin. New Phil. J. 23:388–99.
Agassiz, L. 1849. Twelve lectures on comparative embryology. Boston: Redding.
Agassiz, L. 1859. Essay on classification. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, and Roberts and Triibner.
Altick, R. D. 1957. The English common reader. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Argyll, G. J. 1869. Primeval man. London: Macmillan.
Arnold, M. 1873. Literature and dogma. London: Smith Elder.
Babbage, C. 1830. Reflections on the decline of science in England and on some of its causes. London: Fellowes.
Babbage, C. 1838. Ninth Bridgewater treatise. 2@d ed. London: Murray.
Baer, К. E. von. 1828. Uber Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere, Beobachtung und Reflexion. Konigsberg: Borntrager.
Baer, К. E. von. 1873. The controversy over Darwinism. Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung 130:1968–88 (translated and reprinted in Hull 1973b, pp. 416–25).
Barlow, N. 1967. Darwin and Henslow: The growth of an idea. Letters, 1831–1860. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Barry, M. 1836–1837. On the unity of structure in the animal kingdom. Edin. New Phil. J. 22:116–141, 345–64.
Bartholomew, M. 1973. Lyell and evolution: An account of Lyell’s response to the prospect of an evolutionary ancestry for man. Brit. J. Hist. Sci. 6:261–303.
Bates, H. W. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon Valley. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23:495–566.
Bayne, P. 1871. Life and letters of Hugh Miller. London: Strahan.
Beales, D. 1969. From Castlereagh to Gladstone, 1813–1883. London: Nelson.
Becker, В. H. 1874. Scientific London. London: King.
Ben-David, J. 1971. The scientist’s role in society. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Benn, A. W. 1906. The history of British rationalism in the nineteenth century. New York: Russell and Russell; reprinted 1969.
Best, G. 1971. Mid-victorian Britain: 1831–1873. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Bibby, C. 1959. T. H. Huxley: Scientist, humanist, and educator. London: Watts.
Bibby, C. 1972. Scientist extraordinary: The life and scientific work of Thomas Henry Huxley, 1823–1893. Oxford: Pergamon.
Blyth, E. 1837. On the psychological distinctions between man and all animals and the consequent diversity of human influence over the inferior ranks of creation, from any mutual and reciprocal influence exercised among the latter. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1:1–9, 77–85, 131–41.
Bowen, F. 1845. Vestiges… North Amer. Rev. 60:426–478.
Bowler, P. J. 1974. Darwin’s concepts of variation. J. Hist. Med. Allied Sci. 29:196–212.
Bowler, P. J. 1975. The changing meaning of “evolution.” J. Hist. Ideas 36:95–114.
Bowler, P. J. 1976a. Fossils and progress. New-York: Science History Publications.
Bowler, P. J. 1976b. Malthus, Darwin, and the concept of struggle. J. Hist. Ideas 37:631–50.
Bowler, P. J. 1976c. Alfred Russel Wallace’s concepts of variation. J. Hist. Med. Allied Sci. 31:17–29.
Bowler, P. J. 1977. Darwinism and the argument from design: Suggestion for a reevaluation. J. Hist. Biol. 10:29–43.
Brewster, D. 1837a. The history of the inductive sciences by Whewell. Edin. Rev. 66:110–151.
Brewster, D. 1837b. Review of Comte’s Cours de philosophic positive. Edin. Rev. 67:271–308.
Brewster, D. 1844. Vestiges… North Brit. Rev. 3:470–515.
Brewster, D. 1854. More worlds than one: The creed of the philosopher and the hope of the Christian. London: Murray.
Briggs, A. 1973. Victorian people: A reassessment of persons and themes. Rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brock, W. H., and MacLeod, R. 1976. The “scientists’ declaration”: Reflexions on science and belief in the wake of Essays and Reviews, 1864–5, Brit.J. Hist. Sci. 9:39–66.
Brongniart, A. 1821. Sur les characteres zoologiques des formations. Ann. Mines 6:537–72.
Brongniart, A. 1823. Memoire sur les terrains de sediment superieurs Calcavo-Trappeens du Vicentin. Paris.
Buckland, W. 1820. Vindiciae geologicae; or, The connexion of geology with religion explained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buckland, W. 1823. Reliquiae diluvianae. London: Murray.
Buckland, W. 1836. Geology and mineralogy. Bridgewater Treatise no. 6. London: Pickering.
Buckle, H. T. 1890. History of civilization in England. New York: Appleton.
Burchfield, J. D. 1974. Darwin and the dilemma of geological time. Isis 65:300–321.
Burchfield, J. 1975. Lord Kelvin and the age of the earth. New York: Science History Publications.
Burkhardt, F. 1974. England and Scotland: The learned societies. In The comparative reception of Darwinism, ed. T. F. Glick. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Burkhardt, R. W. 1970. Lamarck, evolution and the politics of science. J. Hist. Biol. 3:275–298.
Burkhardt, R. 1972. The inspiration of Lamarck’s belief in evolution. J. Hist. Biol. 5:413–438.
Burkhardt, R. 1977. The spirit of system: Lamarck and evolutionary biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burn, W. L. 1964. The age of equipoise. London: Allen and Unwin.
Burrow, J. W. 1966. Evolution and society: A study in Victorian social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burstyn, H. L. 1975. If Darwin wasn’t the Beagle’s naturalist, why was he on board? Brit. J. Hist. Sci. 8:62–69.
Butts, R. 1965. Necessary truth in Whewell’s theory of science. Amer. Phil. Quart. 2:1 – 21.
Butts, R. 1968. William Whewell’s theory of scientific method. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Cambridge University. 1851. Cambridge University Callender.
Butts, R. 1865. Cambridge University almanac and register. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Butts, R. 1872. Cambridge University almanac and register. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Butts, R. 1875. Cambridge University almanac and register. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Campbell, B. 1972. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago: Aldine.
Campbell, L. 1901. The nationalization of the old English universities. London: Chapman and Hall.
Cannon, W. F. 1961a. The impact of uniformitarianism: Two letters from John Herschel to Charles Lyell, 1836–1837. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 105:301–314.
Cannon, W. F. 1961b. John F. W. Herschel and the idea of science. J. Hist. Ideas 22:215–239.
Cannon, W. F. 1964a. William Whewell, F.R.S. (1794–1866): Contributions to science and learning. Notes Roy. Soc. Lond. 19:176–191.
Cannon, W. F. 1964Z». Scientists and broad churchmen: An early Victorian intellectual network. J. Brit. Studies 4:65–88.
Cardwell, D. S. L. 1972. The organization of science in England. 2d ed. London: Heinemann.
Carlson, E. A. 1966. The gene: A critical history. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Carlyle, T. 1872. Chartism. London: Chapman and Hall.
Carlyle, T. 1896–1901. Shooting Niagara: And after? In Works of Thomas Carlyle. Vol. 5. Miscellaneous essays, ed. H. D. Traill, pp. 29–30.
Carlyle, T. 1937. Sartor resartus, ed. C. F. Harrold. New York: Odyssey.
Carpenter, W. B. 1839. Principles of general and comparative physiology. London: Churchill.
Carpenter, W. B. 1860. Researches on Foraminifera. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., 1860:150.
Chambers, R. 1844. Vestiges of the natural history of Creation. 1st ed. London: Churchill.
Chambers, R. 1845. Explanations: A sequel to the “Vestiges of the natural history of Creation.” London: Churchill.