http://lectures.princeton.edu/2006/rogerpenrose/.
14. Robert Crittenden et al., «Imprint of Gravitational Waves on the Cosmic Microwave Background», Physical Review Letters 71, no. 3 (1993): 324, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.324.
15. «Получатели медали Дирака 2002 г.», Международный центр теоретической физики, https://www.ictp.it/about-ictp/prizes-awards/the-dirac-medal/the-medallists/dirac-medallists-2002.aspx.
16. Maggie McKee, «Ingenious: Paul J. Steinhardt», Nautilus, September 25, 2014, https://www.nautil.us/issue/17/big-bangs/ingenious-paul-j-steinhardt.
17. Paul J. Steinhardt, «2014: What Scientific Idea Is Ready for Retirement?» Edge, https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25405.
18. Karl. R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (New York and London: Basic Books, 1962).
19. «Это не означает, что Фрейд и Адлер вообще не сказали ничего правильного; лично я не сомневаюсь в том, что многое из того, что они говорили, имеет серьезное значение и вполне может со временем сыграть свою роль в психологической науке, которая будет проверяемой. Но это означает, что те „клинические наблюдения“, которые, как наивно полагают психоаналитики, подтверждают их теорию, делают это не в большей степени, чем ежедневные подтверждения, обнаруживаемые в своей практике астрологами» (К. Поппер. Предположения и опровержения).
20. Helge Kragh, «The Criteria of Science, Cosmology and the Lessons of History», in Michael Heller, Bartosz Brozek, and Łukasz Kurek, eds., Between Philosophy and Science (Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2013). Краг отмечает, что еще в 1982 г. Поппер превозносил модель стационарного состояния Вселенной, называя ее «очень красивой и многообещающей теорией» и утверждая: «То, что еще вчера было метафизической идеей, может стать проверяемой теорией завтра».
21. Natalie Wolchover and Peter Byrne, «In a Multiverse, What are the Odds?» Quanta, November 3, 2014, https://www.quantamagazine.org/20141103-in-a-multiverse-what-are-the-odds/.
22. Anna Ijjas and Paul J. Steinhardt, «Classically Stable Nonsingular Cosmological Bounces», Physical Review Letters 117, 121304 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.121304.
23. Max Tegmark, Our Mathematical Universe (New York: Knopf, 2014).
24. Tegmark, «Good Morning, Inflation!» http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-tegmark/good-morning-inflation-he_b_4976707.html.
25. Amanda Gefter, «From Discovery to Dust», Nova Next, October 29, 2014, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/physics/bicep2/.
26. Dan Vergano, «Alan Guth: Waiting for the Big Bang», National Geographic, June 30, 2014, http://www.news.nationalgeographic.com/news/innovators/2014/06/140630-alan-guth-profile-inflation-cosmology-science/.
27. Ron Cowen, «Cosmology: Polar star», Nature News, March 31, 2014, http://www.nature.com/news/cosmology-polar-star-1.14954.
28. «Focus: Physicists Weigh in on BICEP2», Physics 7 (June 19, 2014): 65, https://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/65.
29. Hoyle, Home Is Where the Wind Blows, 413.
30. Maggie McKee, «Ingenious: Paul J. Steinhardt», http://www.nautil.us/issue/17/big-bangs/ingenious-paul-j-steinhardt.
31. «Focus: Physicists Weigh in on BICEP2», https://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/65.
1. Frank Close, The Infinity Puzzle: Quantum Field Theory and the Hunt for an Orderly Universe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).
2. A. Douglas Stone, «Fantasy Physics: Should Einstein have Won Seven Nobel Prizes», Princeton University Press blog, guest post, March 12, 2014, http://blog.press.princeton.edu/2014/03/12/fantasy-physics-shouldeinstein-have-won-seven-nobel-prizes/.
3. Philip Ball, «How 2 Pro-Nazi Nobelists Attacked Einstein’s „Jewish Science“», Scientific American, February 13, 2015, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-2-pro-nazi-nobelists-attacked-einstein-sjewish-science-excerpt1/.
4. de Solla Price, Little Science, Big Science.
5. Hub Zwart, «The Nobel Prize as a Reward Mechanism in the Genomics Era: Anonymous Researchers, Visible Managers and the Ethics of Excellence», Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7, no. 3 (2010): 299–312, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11673-010-9248-0.
6. Bothwell, «Nobel laureate says scientific breakthrough ‘would not be possible today,’» https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/nobel-laureate-says-scientific-breakthrough-would-not-be-possible-today.
7. Там же.
8. Zuckerman, «Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration, and Authorship», https://doi.org/10.2307/2091086.
9. «Vote for inflation Nobel Prize», Vixra (blog), https://vixra.wordpress.com/2014/03/20/vote-for-inflation-nobel-prize/.
10. P. E. Gibbs, «Who Might Get the Nobel Prize for Cosmic Inflation?» Prespacetime Journal 5, no. 3 (2014): 230–33, https://prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/article/download/614/612.
11. Там же.
12. https://www.nobelprize.org/podcast/.
13. Stuart Clark, «Gravitational waves gives Nobel prize committee another headache», Guardian, March 21, 2014, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/mar/21/gravitational-waves-nobel-prize-inflation.
14. Jim Al-Khalili, «Why the Nobel prizes need a shakeup», Guardian, October 8, 2012, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/08/nobel-prizes-need-shakeup.
15. Harriet Zuckerman, Scientific Elites: Nobel Laureates in the United States (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1996).
16. Randy Kennedy, «Who Was That Food Stylist? Film Credits Roll On», New York Times, January 11, 2004, http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/11/us/who-was-that-food-stylist-film-credits-roll-on.html?_r=0.
17. Elisabeth T. Crawford, The Beginnings of the Nobel Institution: The Science Prizes, 1901–1915 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987).
1. Galileo Galilei, Le operazioni del compasso geometrico e militare (Venice: 1606). [Галилео Галилей. Работа геометрического и военного компаса Галилео Галилея, флорентийского патриция и преподавателя математики в Университете Падуи. Венеция, 1606].
2. Biagioli, Galileo’s Instruments of Credit.
3. Hao Liu, Philipp Mertsch, and Subir Sarkar, «Fingerprints of Galactic Loop I on the Cosmic Microwave Background», Astrophysics Journal 789 (2014): L29, https://doi.org/10.1088 /2041–8205/789/2/L29.
4. Лекция Дэвида Спергеля «WMAP, Planck, BICEP и инфляция» на коллоквиуме «Космология после Планка» 27 марта 2014 г., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3fHkQa6818.
5. Raphael Flauger, J. Colin Hill, and David N. Spergel, «Toward an understanding of foreground emission in the BICEP2 region», Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014:1405.7351, https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.7351.
6. Ron Cowen, «Gravitational wave discovery faces scrutiny», Nature News, May 16, 2014, http://www.nature.com/news/gravitational-wave-discovery-faces-scrutiny-1.15248; Dennis Overbye, «Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim», New York Times, June 19, 2014, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/science/space/scientists-debate-gravity-wave-detection-claim.html?_r=0.
7. Michael J. Mortonson and Uroš Seljak, «A joint analysis of Planck and BICEP2 B-modes including dust polarization uncertainty», Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (October 2014), http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475–7516/2014/10/035/meta;jsessionid=8590E71CAB59298BA35CDF6D3A5A6DC9.c1.iopscience.cld.iop.or.
8. Overbye, «Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim», https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/science/space/scientists-debate-gravity-wave-detection-claim.html?r=0.
9. Пресс-релиз Bell Telephone Laboratories «Недавно открытое радиоизлучение может скрывать ключ к разгадке рождения Вселенной» 23 мая 1965 г.: https://media-bell-labs-com.s3.amazonaws.com/pages/20140518_1641/1965_BL_Press_Release_on_Radiation.pdf.
10. P. James E. Peebles, Lyman A. Page, Jr., and R. Bruce Partridge, eds., Finding the Big Bang (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
11. Joel Achenbach, «Cosmic smash-up: BICEP2’s big bang discovery getting dusted by new satellite data», Achenblog (blog), Washington Post, September 22, 2014, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/achenblog/wp/2014/09/22/planck-satellite-shows-bicep2-telescope-make-have-seen-dust-not-the-big-bang/?utm_term=.a2caa5fe5d75.
12. Shannon Hall, «BICEP2 Was Wrong, But Publicly Sharing the Results Was Right», The Crux (blog), Discover website, January 30, 2015, blogs https://www.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/01/30/bicep2-wrong-sharing-results/#.WNMILhiZMmo.
13. Council for the Advancement of Science Writing, конференция «Новые горизонты в науке», Колумбус, Огайо, 19–20 октября, http://casw.org/conference-new-horizons/conference/new-horizons-science-2014.
14. Steele, «On the Coverage of BICEP2», https://www.nasw.org/article/sciencewriters-coverage-bicep2.
15. «Dust to Dust», editorial, Nature 514, no. 7522 (2014), http://www.nature.com/news/dust-to-dust-1.16137.
16. P. A. R. Ade et al., «Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data», Physical Review Letters