John C. Marshall and Peter W. Halligan, “Blindsight and Insight in Visuo-Spatial Neglect,” Nature 336, no. 6201 (1988): 766–67.
Angela K.-y. Leung et al., “Embodied Metaphors and Creative ‘Acts,’” Psychological Science 23 (2012): 502–9. 46 Or this: if your Michael L. Slepian et al.; “Shedding Light on Insight: Priming Bright Ideas,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, no. 4 (2010): 696–700.
Alison Jing Xu and Aparna A. Labroo, “Turning on the Hot Emotional System with Bright Light,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 24, no. 2 (2014): 207–16.
Oshin Vartanian et al.; “Impact of Contour on Aesthetic Judgements and Approach-Avoidance Decisions in Architecture,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 10, suppl. 2 (2013): 10446–453: Ori Amir, Irving Biederman, and Kenneth J. Hayworth, “The Neural Basis for Shape Preference,” Vision Research 51, no. 20 (2011): 2198–206.
Lawrence W. Barsalou and Mark Johnson. By Barsalou: “Grounded Cognition,” Annual Review of Psychology 59 (2008): 617–45; “Grounded Cognition: Past, Present and Future,” Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (2010): 716–24, and Barsalou et al., “Social Embodiment,” in ed. Brian H. Ross, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 43 (2003): 43–92.
Mark Johnson, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1987); Johnson, Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding (Chicago: University of Chicago, 2008), and Johnson with George Lakoff, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought (New York: Basic Books, 1999).
The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, ed. Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009); The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition, ed. Lawrence Shapiro (New York: Routledge, 2014); Raymond W. Gibbs Jr., Embodiment and Cognitive Science (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005); Evan Thompson, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of the Mind (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).
Barsalou, “Grounded Cognition,” 619, 635; plato.stanford.edu/entries/embodied-cognition/#MetCog
Paula M. Niedenthal and Barsalou, “Embodiment in Attitudes, Social Perception, and Emotion,” Personality and Social Psychology Review 9, no. 3: 184–211, 186.
Johnson, Meaning of the Body, 25–35.
W. Yeh and Barsalou, “The Situated Nature of Concepts,” American Journal of Psychology 119, no. 3 (2006): 349–84.
Damasio, Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (New York: G.P. Putnam’s, 1994); Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain (New York: Pantheon, 2010), cited The Feeling of What Happens.
George Engel, “The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine,” Science 196, no. 4286 (1977): 129–36.
Barsalou, “Grounded Cognition,” Barsalou, “Perceptual Symbol Systems,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999): 577–660; Damasio, Feeling of What Happens and Self Comes to Mind; Anjan Chatterjee and Oshen Vartanian, “Neuroaesthetics,” in Trends in Cognitive Science 18 (2014): 370–75; Vittorio Gallese and Corrado Sinigaglia, “What Is So Special about Embodied Simulation?” Trends in Cognitive Science 15, no. 11 (2011): 512–19, and Vittorio Gallese, “Being Like Me: Self-Other Identity, Mirror Neurons, and Empathy,” in ed. Susan Hurley and Nick Chater, Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science, vol. 1 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005), 108–18.
Gabriel Kreiman, Christof Koch, and Itzhak Fried, “Imagery Neurons in the Human Brain,” Nature 408 (November 16, 2000): 357–361. Bruno Laeng and Unni Sulutvedt, “The Eye Pupil Adjusts to Imaginary Light,” Psychological Science 25, no. 1 (2014): 188–97.
Mark L. Johnson, “Embodied Reason,” in Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture, ed. Gail Weiss and Honi Fern Haber (New York: Routledge, 1999), 81–102.
Erik Myin and J. Kevin O’Regan, “Situated Perception and Sensation in Vision and Other Modalities: A Sensorimotor Approach,” Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, 185–97.
Barbara Tversky, “Structures of Mental Spaces: How People Think About Space,” Environment and Behavior 35, no.1 (2003), 66–80.
Jean Decety and Julie Grèzes, “The Power of Simulation: Imagining One’s Own and Other’s Behavior,” Brain Research 1079, no. 1 (2006): 4–14.
Harry Mallgrave, The Architect’s Brain, 189–206.
Philip Merikle and Meredyth Daneman. “Conscious vs. Unconscious Perception.” The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 2nd ed., ed. Michael S. Gazzaniga (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000), 1295–303. Stanislas Dehaene, The Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).
Barbara Tversky, in “Spatial Cognition,” Cambridge Handbook, describes two ways of responding to environment: one is responding from perception; the other, responding from memory, 205.
Merikle and Daneman, “Conscious vs. Unconscious Perception,” The New Cognitive Sciences; J. M. Ackerman, C. C. Nocera, and John A. Bargh, “Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions,” Science 328, no. 5986 (2010): 1712–715.
E. S. Cross, A. F. Hamilton, and S. T. Grafton, “Building a Motor Simulation de Novo: Observation of Dance by Dancers,” NeuroImage 31, no. 3 (2006): 1257–267.
Lera Boroditsky and Michael Ramscar, “The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought,” Psychological Science 13, no. 2 (2002): 185–89; Barbara Tversky, “Spatial Cognition,” Cambridge Handbook, and Tversky, “The Structure of Experience,” in ed. T. Shipley and J. M. Zachs, Understanding Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 436–64; Catherine L. Reed and Martha J. Farah, “The Psychological Reality of the Body Schema: A Test with Normal Participants,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, no. 2 (1995): 334–43, and Catherine L. Reed, “Body Schemas,” in A. Meltzoff and W. Prinz, eds., The Imitative Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 233–43.
Antonio Damasio, The Feeling of What Happens, 1-60.
Paula M. Niedenthal, “Embodying Emotion,” Science 316, no. 5827 (2007): 1002–5.
Niedenthal, “Embodying Emotion”; Paula M. Niedenthal, Lawrence Barsalou et al.; “Embodiment in Attitudes, Social Perception, and Emotion,” Personality and Social Psychology Review 9, no. 3 (2005): 184–211.
Tversky, “Spatial Cognition,” Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, 207.
Ludwig Hilberseimer: Architect, Educator, and Urban Planner (New York: Rizzoli, 1988).
T. J. Clark, The Painting of Modern Life: Paris and the Art of Manet and His Followers (New York: Knopf, 1984), 42.
Alberto Pérez-Gomez, Architecture and the Crisis of Modern Science.
T. Hafting et al., “Microstructure of a Spatial Map in the Entorhinal Cortex,” Nature 436 (2005): 801–6; Niall Burgess, “How Your Brain Tells You Where You Are,” TED Talks, ted.com/talks/neil_burgess_ how_your_brain_tells_you_where_you_are/transcript?language=en.
Neil Levine, “Frank Lloyd Wright’s Diagonal Planning Revisited,” in ed. Robert McCarter, On and By Frank Lloyd Wright: A Primer of Architectural Principles (New York: Phaidon, 2012), 232–63.
James Timberlake, Refabricating Architecture: How Manufacturing Methodologies Are Poised to Transform Building Construction (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004).
Nancy Aiken, Biological Sources, calls them unconditioned (my term is direct) and unconditioned; Roger Ulrich, “Biophilia, Biophobia, and Natural Landscapes” in ed. Stephen Kellert and Edmund O. Wilson, The Biophilia Hypothesis (Washington, DC: Shearwater, 1993), 78–138.
Esther Sternberg, Healing Spaces, 51–74. 70 These are compulsions Sally Augustin, Place Advantage, 111–34. 70 Understimulating environments Ellard, Places of the Heart, 107–124; Jacoba Urist, “The Psychological Cost of Boring Buildings,” Science of Us (April 2016). 70 Some places elicit Judith H. Heerwagen and Bert Gregory, “Biophilia and Sensory Aesthetics” in ed. Stephen R. Kellert, Judith H. Heerwagen, and Martin L. Mador, Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2008), 227–41.
Brent Berlin and Paul Kay, Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970); Henry Sanoff and Rotraut Walden, “School Environments” in Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, 276–94; Sternberg, Healing Spaces, 24–53; Augustin, Place Advantage, 48, 142; Adam Alter, Drunk Tank Pink: And Other Unexpected Forces That Shape How We Think, Feel, and Behave (New York: Penguin, 2013), 157–80.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith (New York: Routledge, 1962), 211.
Lawrence W. Barsalou, “Grounded Cognition,” 617–45.
George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1980); Lera Boroditsky, “Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors,” Cognition 75 (2000): 1–28; James Geary, I Is an Other: The Secret Life of Metaphor and How It Shapes the Way We See the World (New York: Harper, 2011); S. W. Goldhagen “Aalto’s Embodied Rationalism,” in ed. Stanford Anderson, Gail Fenske, and David Fixler, Aalto and America (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012), 13–35, and Brook Muller, “Metaphor, Environmental Receptivity, and Architectural Design,” unpublished.
Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures, (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 210.
Thomas W. Schubert and Gün R. Semin, “Embodiment as a Unifying Perspective for Psychology,” European Journal of Social Psychology 39, no. 7 (2009): 1135–141.
V. S. Ramachandran’s notion of “peakshift,” presented in Ramachandran and Hirstein’s “The Science of Art: A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience”.