Donner et al. 2008 – Donner T. H., Sagi D., Bonneh Y. S., Heeger D. J. Opposite neural signatures of motion-induced blindness in human dorsal and ventral visual cortex // Journal of Neuroscience. 2008. 28 (41). P. 10298—10310.
Dornhoefer et al. 2000 – Dornhoefer S. M., Pannasch S., Velichkovsky B. M., Unema P. J. A. «Attentional landscapes» and phasic changes of fixation duration in picture perception // Perception. 2000. 29. P. 11—12.
Downing et al. 2001 – Downing P., Liu N., Kanwisher N. Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG // Neuropsychologia. 2001. 39(12). P. 1329—1342.
Drew et al. 2013a – Drew T., Võ M. H., Olwal A., Jacobson F., Seltzer S. E., Wolfe J. M. Scanners and drillers: Characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images // Journal of Vision. 2013. 13 (10). P. 3.
Drew et al. 2013b – Drew T., Võ M. H., Wolfe J. M. The invisible gorilla strikes again: Sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers // Psychological Science. 2013. 24 (9). P. 1848—1853.
Drew et al. 2014 – Drew T., Mance I., Horowitz T. S., Wolfe J. M., Vogel E. K. A soft handoff of attention between cerebral hemispheres // Current Biology. Drewnowski, Healy 1977 – Drewnowski A., Healy A. F. Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word // Memory & Cognition. 1977. 5 (1). P. 636—647.
Driver et al. 2001 – Driver J., Davis G., Russell C., Turatto M., Freeman E. Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects // Cognition. 2001.
Dufau et al. 2015 – Dufau S., Grainger J., Midgley K. J., Holcomb P. J. A thousand words are worth a picture: Snapshots of printed-word processing in an event-related potential megastudy // Psychological Science. 2015.
Duncan 1984 – Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1984. 113 (4). P. 501—517.
Duncan, Humphreys 1989 – Duncan J., Humphreys G. W. Visual search and stimulus similarity // Psychological Review. 1989. 96 (3). P. 433—458.
Dux, Marois 2009 – Dux P. E., Marois R. The attentional blink: a review of data and theory // Attention, Perception, and Psychophys. 2009. 71 (8). P. 1683—1700.
Eckstein et al. 2013 – Eckstein M. P., Mack S. C., Liston D. B., Bogush L., Menzel R., Krauzlis R. J. Rethinking human visual attention: Spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans // Vision research. 2013. 85. P. 5—19.
Egly et al. 1994 – Egly R., Driver J., Rafal R. D. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1994. 123 (2). P. 161—177.
Elliot, Fryer 2008 – Elliot A. J., Fryer J. The Goal Construct in Psychology // Handbook of Motivation Science / Ed. by J. Shah, W. Gardner. New York: Guilford Press, 2008. P. 235—250.
Ellis et al. 1988 – Ellis A. W., Young A. W., Anderson C. Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres // Brain and Language. 1988. 35 (2). P. 254—273.
Enns 2004 – Enns J. T. Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking // Vision Research. 2004. 44 (12). P. 1321—1331.
Enns, Di Lollo 2000 – Enns J. T., Di Lollo V. What’s new in visual masking? // Trends in Cognitive Science. 2000. 4 (9). P. 345—352.
Eriksen, Eriksen 1974 – Eriksen B. A., Eriksen C. W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task // Perception and Psychophysics. 1974. 16 (1). P. 143—149.
Erlikhman et al. 2013 – Erlikhman G., Keane B. P., Mettler E., Horowitz T. S., Kellman P. J. Automatic feature-based grouping during multiple object tracking // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2013. 39 (6). P. 1625—1637.
Estes et al. 2008 – Estes Z., Verges M., Barsalou L. W. Head up, foot down. Object words orient attention to the objects’ typical location // Psychological Science. 2008. 19 (2). P. 93—97.
Falikman et al. 2011 – Falikman M., Gorbunova E., Sinitsyna M. Location-based effects on object-based processing: Evidence from the word superiority effect // Attenton and Objects: Rovereto Attention Workshop-2011. Abstracts. Rovereto: CIMEC, 2011. (URL: http://events.unitn.it/en/ cimec-raw2011/).
Falikman, Stepanov 2012 – Falikman M., Stepanov V. Chunking in rapid serial visual presentation: Consequences for visual awareness // Neuroscience & cognition: Consciousness & cognitive control. Brussels, December 3—4, 2012. P. 33—34.
Fan et al. 2002 – Fan J., McCandliss B. D., Sommer T., Raz A., Posner M. I. Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2002. 14 (3). P. 340—347.
Fernandez-Duque, Johnson 1999 – Fernandez-Duque D., Johnson M. L. Attention metaphors: How metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention // Cognitive Science. 1999. 23. P. 83—116.
Fernandez-Duque, Johnson 2002 – Fernandez-Duque D., Johnson M. L. Cause and Effect theories of attention: The role of conceptual metaphors // Review of General Psychology. 2002. 6 (2). P. 153—165.
Fine 2001a – Fine E. M. Does meaning matter? The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking // Optometry and Vision Science. 2001. 78 (11). P. 831—838.
Fine 2001b – Fine E. M. The word-superiority effect does not depend on one’s ability to identify the letter string as a word // Journal of Vision. 2001. 1 (3). P. 410, 410a.
Fine 2004 – Fine E. M. The relative benefit of word context is a constant proportion of letter identification time // Perception and Psychophysics. 2004. 66 (6). P. 897—907.
Firestone, Scholl 2016 – Firestone C., Scholl B. Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for ‘top-down’ effects // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2016. 39. P. e229.
Flanagan et al. 1998 – Flanagan P., McAnally K. I., Martin R. L., Meehan J. W., Oldfield S. R. Aurally and visually guided visual search in a virtual environment // Human Factors. 1998. 40 (3). P. 461—468.
Fodor 1983 – Fodor J. A. Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.
Friedman et al. 1982 – Friedman A., Polson M. C., Dafoe C. G., Gaskill S. J. Dividing attention within and between hemispheres: Testing a multiple resources approach to limited-capacity information processing // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1982. 8 (5). P. 625—650.
Fr iesen, Kingstone 2003 – Friesen C. K., Kingstone A. Abrupt onsets and gaze direction cues trigger independent reflexive attentional effects // Cognition. 2003. 87. P. B1—B10.
Frischen et al. 2007 – Frischen A., Bayliss A. P., Tipper S. P. Gaze-cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition and individual differences // Psychological Bulletin. 2007. 133. P. 4.
Frömer et al. 2015 – Frömer R., Dimigen O., Niefind F., Krause N., Kliegl R., Sommer W. Are individual differences in reading speed related to extrafoveal visual acuity and crowding? // PLoS ONE. 2015. 10 (3). P. e0121986.
Fusser et al. 2011 – Fusser F., Linden D. E., Rahm B., Hampel H., Haenschel C., Mayer J. S. Common capacity-limited neural mechanisms of selective attention and spatial working memory encoding // European Journal of Neuroscience. 2011. 34 (5). P. 827—838.
Gardner 1987 – Gardner H. The mind’s new science. The history of cognitive revolution. USA: Harper Collins Publishers, Basic Books, 1987.
Geng et al. 2007 – Geng H. Y., Song Q. L., Li Y. F., Xu S., Zhu Y. Attentional modulation of motion-induced blindness // Chinese Science Bulletin. 2007. 52. P. 1063—1070.
Gillebert, Humphreys 2015 – Gillebert C. R., Humphreys G. W. Mutual interplay between perceptual organization and attention: A neuropsychological perspective // Wagemans J. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization. Oxford University Press, 2015. P. 736—757.
Gopher 1994 – Gopher D. Dual-task performance // The Blackwell dictionary of cognitive psychology / Ed. by M. Eysenck. Cornwall, Great Britain, 1994. P. 111—117.
Goschy et al. 2014 – Goschy H., Koch A. I., Mueller H. J., Zehetleitner M. Early top-down control over saccadic target selection: Evidence from a systematic salience difference manipulation // Attention, Perception and Psychophysics. 2014. 76 (2). P. 367—382.
Grabbe 2014 – Grabbe J. Effects of targets embedded within words in a visual search task // Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 2014. 10 (1). P. 1—8.
Grainger et al. 2001 – Grainger J., Van Kang M. N., Segui J. Cross-modal repetition priming of heterographic homophones // Memory and Cognition. 2001. 29 (1). P. 53—61.
Grainger et al. 2003 – Grainger J., Bouttevin S., Truc C., Bastien M., Ziegler J. Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers // Brain and Language. 2003. 66. P. 1105—1114.
Grainger, Jacobs 1994 – Grainger J., Jacobs A. M. A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1994. 20 (6). P. 1158—1176.
Greenberg et al. 2004 – Greenberg S. N., Healy A. F., Koriat A., Kreiner H. The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structure units in guiding and organizing text online // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2004. 11 (1). P. 428—433.
Greenwald 1972 – Greenwald A. G. On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1972. 94 (1). P. 52—57.