Примечания
1
Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations? // Foreign Affairs. 1993. Vol. 72. № 3. Р. 29–30.
2
Цит. по: McGoldrick D. Human Rights and Religion: The Islamic Debate in Europe. Portland, OR, 2006. P. 89.
3
Inglehart R., Norris P. The True Clash of Civilizations // Foreign Policy. 2003. № 135.
4
Riposte Laique, November 26, 2012. http://ripostelaique.com/; также см.: Droite(s)-Extreme(s) blog, http://droites-extremes.blog.lemonde.fr/2010/09/05/ce-quest-vraiment-riposte-laique/.
5
Вот только несколько примеров: Inglehart R., Norris P. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge, 2004; Taylor C. A Secular Age. Cambridge, 2007; Modern J. L. Secularism in Antebellum America. Chicago, 2011; Secularism and Its Critics / Ed. R. Bhargava. New Delhi, 1998; и большинство тех, кто пишет на сайт Научного совета по социологи The Immanent Frame. http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/.
6
О полезном различии между словом и понятием см.: Koselleck R. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concept. Stanford, 2002.
7
Тейлор Ч. Секулярный век. М., 2017. С. 215–216.
8
Асад Т. Возникновение секулярного: христианство, ислам, модерность. М., 2020.
9
Mahmood S. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton, 2016. Р. 21.
10
Davis K. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia, 2008. Р. 11.
11
Ibid. Р. 77.
12
Masuzawa T. The Invention of World Religions, or How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago, 2005. См. также: Klassen P. Christianity as a Polemical Concept // The Companion to the Anthropology of Religion / Ed. J. Boddy, M. Lambek. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. P. 344–362.
13
Асад Т. Возникновение секулярного. С. 9.
14
Stein J. A. Angels in (Mexican) America // American Literature. 2014. Vol. 86. № 4. P. 684. См. также в том же номере: Coviello P., Hickman J. Introduction: After the Postsecular.
15
Саид Э. Ориентализм. М., 2006. С. 9.
16
Farris S. Femonationalism and the «Regular» Army of Labor Called Migrant Women // History of the Present. 2012. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 196.
17
Цит. по: Schwartz L. Infidel Feminism: Secularism, Religion and Women’s Emancipation, England, 1830–1914. Manchester, 2015. P. 8. Шварц пишет о трудностях, с которыми столкнулись феминистки внутри секуляристского движения при оспаривании аргументов естественного права о месте женщины.
18
Le Grand Robert de La Langue Française, 2nd ed. Paris, 1987. Vol. 5. P. 915.
19
Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers. Vol. 14. P. 881.
20
The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. New York, 1971. Vol. 2. P. 2704.
21
Casanova J. Secularization // International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences / Ed. N. Smelser, P. B. Baltes. Amsterdam, 2001. P. 13787–13791.
22
Ibid.
23
Encyclopedie. Vol. 14. P. 881.
24
Asad T. Genealogies of Religion: Disciplines and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, 2009. P. 28.
25
Wallach Scott J. Parité: Sexual Equality and the Crisis of French Universalism. Chicago, 2005.
26
Conseil d’Etat. Rèflexions sur la laicité. Paris: Conseil d’Etat, 2004. P. 295.
27
Ibid. P. 341.
28
Цит. по: Ibid. P. 128; см. также P. 206. Dahlab v. Switzerland, Application № 42393/98 ECHR (2001).
29
Cour Europeenne des Droits de l’Homme. Grand Chambre, Affaire Lautsi et autres, c. Italie (Requete no. 30814/06), March 18, 2011, 15:11.9.
30
Ratzinger J., Habermas J. The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. San Francisco.
31
Renan E. De la part des peuples sèmitiques dans l’histoire de la civilization (1862). См. также: Renan E. L’ Islamisme et la Science // Discours et Conferences. Paris, 1887. Там он говорит об «неполноценности мусульманских стран, управляемых исламом, интеллектуальном ничтожестве тех, кто получает свою культуру и образование от этой религии» (P. 377).
32
Masuzawa T. The Invention of World Religions. P. 20.
33
Ibid. P. 179.
34
Anidjar G. Secularism // Critical Inquiry. 2006. Vol. 33. P. 66.
35
Цит. по: Mitchell T. Colonizing Egypt. Berkeley, 1991. P. 111.
36
Fanon F. Algeria Unveiled // A Dying Colonialism. New York, 1965. P. 177.
37
Ibid. P. 165.
38
Stoler A. L. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley, 2002. P. 13.
39
Zupančič A. Why Psychoanalysis? Summertalk series. Natchitoches, LA, 2008. P. 7.
40
Лефор К. Политические очерки (XIX–XX вв.). М., 2000.
41
Фуко М. Воля к истине. По ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. М., 1996. С. 205.
42
Floyd K. The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. Minneapolis, 2009. P. 6.
43
Armstrong N. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York, 1987. P. 89.
44
Riley D. «Am I that Name?» Feminism and the Category of «Women» in History. London, 1988. P. 8.
45
Barker-Benfield G. J. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, 1996. P. xxvi.
46
Hull I. Sexuality, State, and Civil Society in Germany, 1700–1815. Ithaca, 1997. P. 296.
47
Juster S. Disorderly Women: Sexual Politics and Evangelicalism in Revolutionary New England. Ithaca, 1996. P. 216.
48
Maddock Dillon E. The Gender of Freedom: Fictions of Liberalism and the Literary Public Sphere. Stanford, 2007. P. 3.
49
Najmabadi A. Women with Mustaches and Men without Beards: Gender and Sexual Anxieties of Iranian Modernity. Berkeley, 2005. P. 3.
50
Brown W. Undoing the Demos: Liberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, 2015.
51
Auclert H. Le vote des femmes. Paris, 1908. P. 56–57.
52
Auclert H. Les femmes arabes en Algérie. Paris, 1900. P. 63.
53
Auclert H. Vote des femmes. P. 56–57.
54
Shakman Hurd E. The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton, 2008.
55
Ibid.
56
Chadwick O. The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge 1975. P. 93.
57
Seeley P. O Sainte Mere: Liberalism and the Socialization of Catholic Men in Nineteenth-Century France // Journal of Modern History. 1998. Vol. 70. № 4. P. 866.
58
Hufton O. Women in Revolution // French Politics and Society. 1989. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 66. Это не значит, что женщины уже не считались (во время Старого режима) проявляющими больший религиозный пыл, нежели мужчины, имеется в виду только то, что в дискурсе антиклерикализма в XIX и XX столетиях революция 1789 г. воспринималась как порождающий момент. См. об этом: Kreiser R. Enthusiasm in Early Eighteenth-Century Paris: The Convulsionaries of Saint-Medard // Catholic Historical Review. 1975. Vol. 61. № 3. P. 353–385; Tallett F. Dechristianizing France // Religion, Society, and Politics in France since 1789 / Eds. F. Tallett, N. Atkin. London, 1991; Thomas K. Women in the Civil War Sects // Crisis in Europe, 1560–1660 / Ed. T. Ashton. New York, 1965. P. 317–340.
59
Цит. по: Cobb R. Les armees revolutionnaires: Instrument de la terreur dans les departements, avril 1793-Floreal an II. Paris, 1961–63. P. 450.
60
Tallett F. Dechristianizing France. P. 26.
61
Моро цитируется в: A History of Private Life. Vol. 4. From the Fires of Revolution to the Great War / Ed. M. Perrot. Cambridge, 1994. P. 44.
62
Agulhon M. Marianne au combat: L’imagerie et la symbolique republicaine de 1789 а 1880. Paris, 1992.
63
Stahuljak Z. Pornographic Archaeology: Medicine, Medievalism, and the Invention of the French Nation. Philadelphia, 2012.
64
Curtis S. A. Charitable Ladies: Gender, Class and Religion in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Paris // Past and Present 2002. № 177. P. 121–156. Информацию о женщинах и католической церкви можно также найти в: Clark L. Schooling the Daughters of Marianne: Textbooks and the Socialization of Girls in Modern French Primary Schools. Albany, 1986; Di Giorgio M. The Catholic Model // A History of Women in the West. Emerging Feminism from Revolution to World War / Ed. G. Duby, M. Perrot. Cambridge, 1993. Vol. 4; Gibson R. Le catholicisme et les femmes en France au XIXe siècle // Revue d’histoire de l’Eglise de France. 1993. № 79. P. 63–94; Harrison C. Zouave Stories // Journal of Modern History. 2007. Vol. 79. № 2. P. 274–305; Langlois C. Catholics and Seculars // Realms of Memory / Ed. P. Nora. New York, 1996; Mills H. «La Charite est une mere»: Catholic Women and Poor Relief in France, 1690–1850 // Charity, Philanthropy and Reform / Eds. M. Cunningham, J. Innes. London, 1998; Seeley P. O Sainte Mere. P. 862–891; Stone J. Anticlericals and Bonnes Soeurs: The Rhetoric of the 1901 Law of Association // French Historical Studies. 2000. Vol. 23. № 1. P. 103–128.
65
Seeley P. O Sainte Mere. P. 891.
66
Michelet J. La Femme // Oeuvres Completes. 1985. Vol. 18.
67
Michelet J. Du Prêtre, de la femme, de la famille. Paris, 1845. P. vi. Дальнейшие ссылки на эту книгу даются номерами страниц в тексте. См. также: Verhoeven T. Neither Male nor Female: The Jesuit as Androgyne, 1843–1870 // Modern and Contemporary France. 2008. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 37–49.
68
Michelet J. L’ Amour // Oeuvres Completes. Paris, 1985. Vol. 18. P. 221–223.
69
Цит. по: Barthes R. Michelet. New York, 1987. P. 148.
70
Hause S. C., Kenny A. R. Women’s Suffrage and Social Politics in the French Third Republic. Princeton, 1984. P. 240. См. также: P. 236–241.
71
Mayeur F. The Secular Model of Girls’ Education // A History of Women in the West. 1993. Vol. 4.
72
Daughton J. P. An Empire Divided: Religion, Republicanism, and the Making of French Colonialism, 1880–1914. Oxford, 2006. P. 124.
73
Wenger T. The God-in-the-Constitution Controversy: American Secularisms in Historical Perspective // Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age / Eds. L. E. Cady, E. Shakman Hurd. New York, 2010. P. 91.
74
Modern J. L. Secularism in Antebellum America. Chicago, 2011. P. 75.
75
Вебер М. Хозяйственная этика мировых религий. Сравнительные очерки по социологии религии // Избранное: протестантская этика и дух капитализма. М., 2013. С. 234.
76
Modern J. L. Secularism. P. 20.
77
Connolly B. Domestic Intimacies: Incest and the Liberal Subject in Nineteenth-Century America. Philadelphia, 2014. P. 83.
78
Juster S. Disorderly Women: Sexual Politics and Evangelicalism in Revolutionary New England. Ithaca, 1996. P. 7.
79
Ibid. P. 109.
80
Ibid. P. 128.
81
Ibid. P. 112.
82
Juster S. Doomsayers: Anglo-American Prophecy in the Age of Revolution. Philadelphia, 2003; Taylor B. Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century. New York, 1982; Thompson E. P. The Making of the English Working Class. New York, 1966.
83
Moglen S. Excess and Utopia: Meditations on Moravian Bethlehem // History of the Present. 2012. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 136.
84
Ibid. P. 140–141.
85
Цитата из нашей с Могленом частной переписки по электронной почте.
86
Modern S. Secularism. P. 3, 26.
87
Douglas A. The Feminization of American Culture. New York: Knopf, 1977. О феминизме и религии в Европе см.: Hastings D. K. Fears of a Feminized Church // European Historical Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 38. № 1. P. 34–65.
88
Modern S. Secularism. P. 37.
89
Douglas A. Feminization. P. 44.
90
Modern S. Secularism. P. 249.
91
Douglass A. Feminization. P. 57.
92
Ibid. P. 10.
93
Modern S. Secularism. P. 25.
94
Maddock Dillon E. The Gender of Freedom: Fictions of Liberalism and the Literary Public Sphere. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007. P. 202.
95
Connolly B. «Hindoo Marriage» and National Sovereignty in the Early Nineteenth-Century United States // Warring for America, 1803–1818 / Eds. N. Eustace, F. J. Teute. Chapel Hill, 2017. P. 25. Ирония в том, что сторонники секуляризма в итальянском националистическом движении 1920‑х гг. считали индуизм рациональной системой веры, совместимой с секулярным правлением, в отличие от «фанатичного» ислама, который был для них олицетворением религии. См. Stephens J. The Politics of Muslim Rage // History Workshop Journal. 2013. № 77. P. 48.
96
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion: Religious Politics in Pre-Revolutionary Baden. Princeton, 1996. P. 98. См. также: Weir T. Secularism and Religion in Nineteenth-Century Germany. Cambridge, 2014.
97
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion. P. 99.
98
Wenger T. The God-in-the-Constitution Controversy.
99
Gordon S. B. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, 2002.
100
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion. P. 101–102.
101
Токвиль А. де. Демократия в Америке. М., 1992. С. 436.
102
Modern S. Secularism. P. 113.
103
Mack P. Religion, Feminism, and the Problem of Agency: Reflections on Eighteenth-Century Quakerism // Women, Gender and Enlightenment / Eds. Knott S., Taylor B. Hampshire, 2005. P. 434–459; Mahmood S. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
104
Mahmood S. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton, 2016. P. 43.
105
Al-Azmeh A. Islam and Modernities. London, 1993. P. 12.
106
Massad J. Colonial Effects: The Making of National Identity in Jordan. New York, 2001. P. 51.
107
Hallaq W. B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge, 2009. P. 118.
108
Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 82.
109
Ibid. P. 82.
110
Hallaq W. B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. P. 85.
111
Ibid. P. 120.
112
Halley J., Rittich K. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law: Genealogies and Contemporary Studies of Family Law Exceptionalism // Special issue on Comparative Family Law of the American Journal of Comparative Law. 2010. № 58.
113
Ibid. P. 753.
114
Chatterjee I. Monastic Governmentality, Colonial Misogyny, and Postcolonial Amnesia in South Asia // History of the Present. 2013. Vol. 3. № 1.
115
Mahmood S. Religious Difference. P. 23.
116
Mahmood S. Sexuality and Secularism // Religion, the Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference / Eds. L. E. Cady, T. Fessenden. New York, 2013. P. 51.
117
Surkis J. Scandalous Subjects: Intimacy and Indecency in France and French Algeria, готовится к выходу.
118
Halley J., Rittich K. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law. P. 772.
119
Baron B. The Making of the Egyptian Nation // Gendered Nations: Nationalisms and Gender Order in the Long Nineteenth Century / Eds. I. Blom, K. Hagemann, C. Hall. Oxford, 2000. P. 138.
120
Mahmood S. Religious Difference. P. 32.
121
Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 51.
122
Halley J., Rittich K. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law. P. 773. См. также: Klassen P. Mentality, Fundamentality, and the Colonial Secular // The Postsecular Condition / Eds. R. Braidotti, B. Blaagaard, E. Midden. London, 2014. P. 175–194.
123
Fanon F. Algeria Unveiled // A Dying Colonialism. New York, 1965. P. 63.
124
Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 83.
125
Hallaq W. B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. P. 123, цитируя Mir-Hosseini Z. Marriage on Trial: A Study of Islamic Family Law. London, 2000.
126
Ibid. P. 168; Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 85–99.
127
Jayawardena K. Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World. London, 1986. P. 4.
128
Ibid. P. 24.
129
Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. Chicago, 2015. P. 189.
130
Цитируется во Введении, примеч. 4.
131
Цит. по: Floyd K. The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009. P. 87.
132
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 245.
133
Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. М., 1996. С. 66. Дюркгейм был не единственным, кто это отмечал, ему предшествовал Руссо, за ним последовал Фрейд.
134
Цит. по: Kingsley S. Kent, Sex and Suffrage in Britain, 1860–1914. Princeton, 1987. P. 54.
135
Bloch I. The Sexual Life of Our Time // Its Relations to Modern Civilisation, 1908. P. 534.
136
Dudink S. Masculinity, Effeminacy, Time // Masculinities in Politics and War: Gendering Modern History / Eds. S. Dudink, K. Hagemann, J. Tosh. Manchester, 2009. P. 78.
137
Klinger C. Woman-Landscape-Artwork: Alternative Realms or Patriarchal Reserves? // Continental Philosophy in Feminist Perspective: Re-reading the Canon in German / Eds. H. Nagl-Docekal, C. Klinger. University Park, 2000. P. 166–167.
138
Nye R. Masculinity and Male Codes of Honor in Modern France. Berkeley, 1998; Fraisse G. Reason’s Muse: Sexual Difference and the Birth of Democracy. Chicago, 1994.
139
Laqueur T. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
140
Barker-Benfield G.‑J. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, 1996. P. 127.
141
Ibid.
142
Ibid.
143
Michelet J. L’ Amour // Oeuvres Completes. Vol. 18. P. 61–62.
144
Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, 1989. P. 189.
145
Conway J. Stereotypes of Femininity in a Theory of Sexual Evolution // Suffer and Be Still: Women in the Victorian Age / Ed. M. Vicinus. Bloomington, 1972. P. 147.
146
Ibid. P. 141.
147
Hollis P. Women in Public, 1850–1914: Documents of the Victorian Women’s Movement. London, 1979. P. 30.
148
Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? P. 209.
149
Hull I. Sexuality, State, and Civil Society in Germany, 1700–1815. Ithaca, 1997. P. 249.
150
Ibid.
151
Ibid.
152
Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. С. 67.
153
О расовой теории в этот период см. Daughton J. P. An Empire Divided: Religion, Republicanism, and the Making of French Colonialism, 1880–1914. Oxford, 2006; Curtis S. A. Civilizing Habits: Women Missionaries and the Revival of French Empire. Oxford, 2010; Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? P. 211–212; Young R. J. C. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. New York, 1995.
154
Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? P. 222.
155
Kent A. Sex and Suffrage. P. 42.
156
Hall C. The Sweet Delights of Home // A History of Private Life / Ed. M. Perrot. Cambridge, 1990. Vol. 4. P. 50.
157
Цит. по: D’Emilio J., Freedman E. B.Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America. Chicago, 1997. P. 146.
158
Borie J. Une gynecologie passionne // Miserable et glorieuse: La femme du XIXe siècle. Paris, 1980. P. 157–188.
159
Вебер М. Наука как призвание и профессия // Избранное: протестантский дух и этика капитализма. М.; СПб., 2013. С. 545.
160
Там же. С. 533.
161
Вебер М. Хозяйственная этика мировых религий // Там же. С. 223–224.
162
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира // Там же. С. 24.
163
Там же. С. 29.
164
Brown W. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reader in Political Theory. Lanham, 1988.
165
Klinger C. Woman-Landscape-Artwork. P. 159.
166
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира. С. 38.
167
Aries P. Western Attitudes toward Death. Baltimore, 1974. P. 56–57.
168
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира. С. 37–38.
169
Farley J., Geison G. L. Science, Politics and Spontaneous Generation in Nineteenth-Century France: The Pasteur-Pouchet Debate // Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 1974. № 48. P. 161–198.
170
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 242.
171
Aries P. Western Attitudes. P. 105.
172
Densmore et al. v. Evergreen Camp, № 147, Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two, 61 Wash. 230; 112. P. 255; 1910 Wash. Lexis 1320, http://courts.mrsc.org/washreports/061WashReport/061WashReport0230.htm. Я очень благодарна Эллен Страуд за эту ссылку.
173
Castronovo R. Necro Citizenship: Death, Eroticism, and the Public Sphere in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Durham, 2001.
174
Aries P. Western Attitudes. P. 56–57.
175
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира. С. 38.
176
Kordela A. K. (Psychoanalytic) Biopolitics and Bioraism // Umbr(a). 2011. P. 19. См. также: Kordela A. K. Biopolitics: From Tribes to Commodity Fetishism // Differences. 2013. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 1–29; Kordela A. K. Surplus: Spinoza, Lacan. Albany, 2007.
177
Edelman L. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004. P. 66.
178
Цит. по: Nye R. Masculinity. P. 55.
179
Ibid. P. 56.
180
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира. С. 30.
181
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 244.
182
Connolly B. Domestic Intimacies: Incest and the Liberal Subject in Nineteenth-Century America. Philadelphia, 2014. P. 10.
183
Surkis J. Sexing the Citizen: Morality and Masculinity in France, 1870–1920. Ithaca, 2006.
184
Connolly B. Domestic Intimacies. P. 220.
185
Connolly B. «Hindoo Marriage» and National Sovereignty in the Early Nineteenth-Century United States // Warring for America, 1803–1818 / Eds. N. Eustace, F. J. Teute. Chapel Hill, 2017. P. 25.
186
Hull I. Sexuality, State and Civil Society. P. 318–319.
187
Rochefort F. Laicite et droits des femmes: Quelques jalons pour une reflexion historique // Archives de Philosophie du droit. 2005. № 48. P. 100.
188
Perrot M. Introduction // A History of Private Life. P. 106.
189
Najmabadi A. Women with Mustaches and Men without Beards. P. 59.
190
Kholoussy H. Talking about a Revolution: Gender and the Politics of Marriage in Early Twentieth-Century Egypt // Graduate Researcher: Journal for the Arts, Sciences, and Technology. 2003. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 29.
191
Pursley S. A Race against Time: Governing Femininity and Reproducing the Future in Revolutionary Iraq, 1945–1963. P. 19. Диссертация, защищенная в 2011 году в Городском университете Нью-Йорка.
192
Ibid. P. 10, 20.
193
Hull I. Sexuality, State, and Civil Society. P. 295.
194
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion: Religious Politics in Pre-Revolutionary Baden. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. P. 95–98.
195
Therborn G. Between Sex and Power: Family in the World, 1900–2000. New York, 2004. P. 17.
196
Rochefort F. Laicite et droits des femmes. P. 101.
197
О Британии см.: Klug F. «Oh to Be in England»: The British Case Study // Woman-Nation-State / Ed. N. Yuval-Davis, F. Anthias. London, 1989. О британском влиянии в Иордании см.: Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 35–38.
198
Sydie R. A. Sex and the Sociological Fathers // Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 1994. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 123.
199
Jakobsen J. Sex + Freedom = Regulation. Why? // Social Text. 2005. № 84–85. P. 294.
200
Aries P. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. New York, 1965.
201
Donzelot J. La police des familles. Paris: Editions des Minuit, 1977. P. 15.
202
Edelman L. No Future. P. 114, 134.
203
Ibid. P. 12.
204
Ibid. Р. 34.
205
Pursley S. A Race against Time. P. 18.
206
Martin-Fugier A. Bourgeois Rituals // A History of Private Life. Vol. 4. P. 336.
207
Donzelot J. La police des familles.
208
Barker-Benfield G. J. The Spermatic Economy: A Nineteenth-Century View of Sexuality // Feminist Studies. 1972. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 56.
209
Connolly B. Domestic Intimacies; Aisenberg A. Contagion: Disease, Government, and the «Social Question» in Nineteenth-Century France. Stanford, 1999.
210
Ridley H. Images of Imperial Rule. London, 1983. P. 75. См. также: Ridley H. Germany in the Mirror of Its Colonial Literature // German Life and Letters. 1974–1975. № 28. P. 375–386; Aitken R. Exclusion and Inclusion: Gradations of Whiteness and Socio-Economic Engineering in German Southwest Africa, 1884–1914. Bern, 2007.
211
Surkis J. Scandalous Subjects: Intimacy and Indecency in France and French Algeria.
212
Hammerton A. J. Feminism and Female Emigration, 1861–1886 // A Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Victorian Women / Ed. M. Vicinus. Bloomington, 1977. P. 57.
213
Chailley-Bert J. L’ Immigration des femmes aux colonies. Paris, 1897. P. 23. Выступление перед собранием Французского колониального совета 12 января 1897.
214
Ibid. P. 59.
215
Rifkin M. When Did Indians Become Straight? Kinship, the History of Sexuality, and Native Sovereignty. Oxford, 2011. P. 149.
216
Ibid. P. 151.
217
Ibid. P. 152.
218
Ibid. P. 153. См. также Miles T. Ties that Bind: The Story of an Afro-Cherokee Family in Slavery and Freedom. Berkeley, 2005.
219
Zimmerman A. Alabama in Africa: Booker T. Washington, the German Empire, and the Globalization of the New South. Princeton, 2010. P. 92.
220
Pursley S. A Race against Time. P. 162.
221
Ibid. P. 183–184.
222
Смит А. Исследование о природе и богатстве народов. М., 2023. С. 67.
223
Цит. по: Moreau T. Le sang de l’histoire: Michelet, l’histoire, et l’idée de la femme aux XIXe siècle. Paris, 1982. P. 74.
224
Zaretsky E. Capitalism, the Family, and Personal Life. New York, 1976. P. 25. См. также: Энгельс Ф. Происхождение семьи, частной собственности и государства. М., 2023.
225
Dillon E. M. The Gender of Freedom: Fictions of Liberalism and the Literary Public Sphere. Stanford, 2004. P. 203.
226
Ibid.
227
Ibid. P. 40.
228
Цит. по: Lewis J. Women in England, 1870–1950: Sexual Division and Social Change. Sussex, 1984. P. 175.
229
Donzelot J. La police des familles. P. 38.
230
Цит. по: Stewart M. L. Women, Work and the French State: Labour Protection and Social Patriarchy, 1879–1919. Montreal, 1989. P. 175. См. также: Simon J. L’ Ouviere, Paris, 1861.
231
Zimmerman A. Alabama in Africa. P. 96.
232
McClintock A. Family Feuds: Gender, Nationalism, and the Family // Feminist Review. 1993. № 44. P. 64.
233
Цит. по: Lepore J. Comment: The Sovereignty of Women // New Yorker. 2016. April 18. P. 18.
234
Gouges O. de. Déclaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne. Paris, 1791.
235
Viennot E. De l’Ancien Régime au Nouveau: La masculinité au fondement de la modernité // Les défis de la république: Genre, territoires, citoyenneté / Eds. B. Perreau, J. W. Scott. Paris, 2017.
236
Цит. по: Nye R. Masculinity and Male Codes of Honor in Modern France. Berkeley, 1998. P. 156.
237
Цит. по: Women in Revolutionary Paris, 1789–1795 / Eds. D. Gay Levy, D. Branson Applewhite, M. Durham Johnson. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1979. P. 215.
238
Письмо Томаса Джефферсона Анне Уилинг Бингам, 11 мая 1788. http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/presidents/thomas-jefferson/letters-of-thomas-jefferson/jefl69.php.
239
Kerber L. The Republic Mother: Women and the Enlightenment — an American Perspective // American Quarterly. 1976. Vol. 28. № 2. P. 187–205.
240
Brown W. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Theory. Lanham, 1988.
241
Цит. по: Knibiehler Y. Les médecins et la «Nature féminine» au temps du Code civil // Annales E. S. C. 1976. № 31. P. 835.
242
Brown W. Manhood and Politics. P. 180.
243
Hull I. Sexuality, State, and Civil Society. P. 335.
244
Ibid. P. 411.
245
Ibid.
246
Fraisse G., Perrot M. Defining the Essence of Femininity // A History of Women in the West / Ed. M. Perrot. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993. P. 11.
247
Pateman C. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988. P. 113.
248
Ibid. P. 181.
249
Токвиль А. де. Демократия в Америке. М.: Прогресс, 1992. С. 436.
250
Ibid.
251
Hull I. Sexuality, State, Civil Society. P. 240.
252
McClintock A. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York, 1995. P. 45.
253
Локк Дж. Трактат II // Два трактата о правлении. М., 2019. С. 296.
254
Цит. по: Pateman C. The Sexual Contract. P. 97.
255
Фрейд З. Тотем и табу // Фрейд З. Сочинения: В 10 т. М., 2007. Т. 8. С. 426.
256
Там же. С. 430.
257
Там же. С. 433.
258
Copjec J. Read My Desire: Lacan against the Historicists. Cambridge, 1994. P. 154.
259
Фрейд З. Тотем и табу. С. 428. См. также: Lacan J. The Signification of the Phallus // Écrits: A Selection, London, 1977.
260
Канторович Э. Два тела короля. Исследование по средневековой политической теологии. М.: Изд-во Ин-та Гайдара, 2015.
261
Stallybrass P., White A. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca, 1986.
262
Цит. по: Tixerant J. Le féminisme à l’époque de 1848 dans l’ordre politique et l’ordre économique. Paris, 1908. P. 86.
263
Руссо Ж.‑Ж. Эмиль, или о Воспитании // Руссо Ж.‑Ж. Педагогические сочинения: В 2 т. М., 1981. Т. 1. С. 434. См. также: Zerilli L. Signifying Woman: Culture and Chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill. Ithaca, 1994.
264
Гегель Г.‑В.‑Ф. Философия права. М., 1990. С. 216.
265
Lacan J. The Signification of the Phallus.
266
Surkis J. Carnival Balls and Penal Codes: Body Politics in July Monarchy France // History of the Present. 2011. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 77–78.
267
Лефор К. Вопрос о демократии // Политические очерки (XIX–XX вв.). М., 2000. С. 26.
268
Там же. С. 29.
269
Вебер М. Хозяйственная этика мировых религий. С. 237.
270
Copjec J. Read My Desire. P. 153.
271
Лефор К. Вопрос о демократии. С. 26.
272
Scott Wallach J. Introduction: Flyers into the Unknown. The Fantasy of Feminist History. Durham, NC, 2011. P. 1–22.
273
Thébaud F. The Great War and the Triumph of Sexual Division // A History of Women in the West. Vol. 5. Toward a Cultural Identity in the Twentieth Century / Eds. F. Thébaud, G. Duby, M. Perrot. Cambridge, 1994. P. 35.
274
Roberts M. L. Civilization without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917–1927. Chicago, 1994. P. 4.
275
de Condorcet. On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship // Selected Writings. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976. P. 98.
276
Levy D. G., Applewhite H. B., Johnson M. D. Women in Revolutionary Paris. P. 220.
277
Ibid.
278
Цит. по: Offen K. Ernest Legouvé and the Doctrine of «Equality in Difference» for Women: A Case Study of Male Feminism in Nineteenth-Century French Thought // Journal of Modern History. 1986. Vol. 58. № 2. P. 476.
279
Цит. по: Fauré C. La démocratie sans les femmes: Essai sur le libéralisme en France. Paris, 1986. P. 226.
280
Alary J. Le travail de la femme dans l’imprimerie typographique; Ses conséquences physiques et morales. Paris, 1883. P. 15.
281
Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer: French Feminists and the Rights of Man. Cambridge, 1996. P. 118–119.
282
Gubin E., Jacques C., Marissal C. Une citoyenneté différée? Le suffrage féminin en Belgique, 1830–1940 // Féminismes et identités nationales/ Eds. Y. Cohen, F. Thébaud. Programme Rhône-Alpes de recherche en sciences humaines, 1998. P. 100.
283
Evans S. Born for Liberty: A History of Women in America. New York, 1989. P. 56.
284
Ibid. P. 154.
285
Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989. P. 13.
286
Hollis P. Women in Public, 1850–1900: Documents of the Victorian Women’s Movement. London, 1979. P. 305.
287
Ibid. P. 307.
288
Ibid. P. 320.
289
Conway J. Stereotypes of Femininity in a Theory of Sexual Evolution // Suffer and Be Still: Women in the Victorian Age/ Ed. M. Vicinus. Bloomington, 1972. P. 144.
290
Ibid. P. 146.
291
Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer.
292
Riley D. Am I that Name? См. особенно P. 67–69, 112–113. См. также: Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism.
293
Hollis P. Women in Public. P. 28–30.
294
Ibid. P. 312.
295
Ibid. P. 331.
296
Evans S. Born for Liberty. P. 15.
297
Цит. по: Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer. P. 77.
298
Riley D. Am I that Name? P. 46.
299
Ibid. P. 48.
300
Ibid. P. 72–73.
301
Бовуар С. де. Второй пол. М., 1997. С. 175.
302
Там же. С. 762.
303
Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. P. 110.
304
Scott Wallach J. Parité. P. 143.
305
Riley D. Am I that Name? P. 112–113.
306
Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. P. 186.
307
Koven S., Michel S. Womanly Duties: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States // Gender and History in Western Europe / Ed. R. Shoemaker, M. Vincent. London, 1998. P. 339.
308
Ibid.
309
Pelletier M. La Femme en lutte pour ses droits. Paris, 1907. P. 37. О Пеллетье см.: Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer. P. 125–160.
310
Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. P. 221.
311
Ibid. P. 174.
312
Eisenstein H. Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women’s Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World. Boulder, 2009.
313
Lagrave R.‑M. A Supervised Emancipation // A History of Women in the West. 1993. Vol. 5. P. 467.
314
Ibid. P. 488.
315
Göle N. The Gendered Nature of the Public Sphere // Public Culture. 1997. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 68. См. также: Göle N. Islam and Secularity: The Future of Europe’s Public Sphere. Durham, 2015.
316
White J. State Feminism, Modernization, and the Turkish Republican Woman // NWSA Journal. 2003. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 153–154.
317
Kandiyoti D. Emancipated but Unliberated? Reflections on the Turkish Case // Feminist Studies. 1987. Vol. 13. № 2. P. 324. См. также: Cinar A. Subversion and Subjugation in the Public Sphere: Secularism and the Islamic Headscarf // Signs. 2008. Vol. 33. № 4. P. 891–913; Arat Z. F. Kemalism and Turkish Women // Women and Politics. 1994. Vol. 14. № 4. P. 57–80.
318
Pursley S. A Race against Time. P. 83.
319
Ibid.
320
Thompson E. Colonial Citizens: Republican Rights, Paternal Privilege, and Gender in French Syria and Lebanon. New York, 2000. P. 143.
321
Sinha M. Specters of Mother India: The Global Restructuring of an Empire. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006. P. 235.
322
Ibid.
323
Ibid.
324
Ibid.
325
Ibid. P. 222.
326
Ibid. P. 253.
327
Лефор К. Права человека и провиденциональное государство // Политические очерки (XIX–XX вв.). М., 2000. С. 56.
328
Жак Маритен называл его «теократическим атеизмом». Цит. по: Moyn S. From Communist to Muslim: European Human Rights, the Cold War, and Religious Liberty // South Atlantic Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 11. № 3:1. P. 72.
329
История религии при советском строе сложнее, чем предполагает антикоммунистическая риторика. Хотя атеизм и был государственной политикой, религия была подавлена не полностью; иногда ее терпели и даже поощряли официальные лица. Касательно менявшейся советской политики в отношении религии см.: Smith S. A. Communism and Religion // The Cambridge History of Communism / Eds. J. Furst, S. Pons, M. Selden. Cambridge, 2017. Vol. 3.
330
Kirby D. Harry Truman’s Religious Legacy: The Holy Alliance, Containment, and the Cold War // Religion and the Cold War / Ed. D. Kirby. Basingstoke, 2003. P. 78.
331
См.: Aiello T. Constructing «Godless Communism»: Religion, Politics, and Popular Culture, 1954–1960 // Americana: The Journal of American Popular Culture. 2005. Vol. 4. № 1.
332
Shaw T. «Martyrs, Miracles, and Martians»: Religious and Cold War Cinematic Propaganda in the 1950s // Religion and the Cold War. P. 214.
333
Фуко М. Рождение биополитики. СПб., 2010. С. 86.
334
Там же. С. 88. Проницательный анализ на основании этих лекций см. в: Sabsay L. The Emergence of the Other Sexual Citizen: Orientalism and the Modernisation of Sexuality // Citizenship Studies. 2012. Vol. 16. № 5–6. P. 605–623.
335
Kirby D. Harry Truman’s Religious Legacy: The Holy Alliance, Containment and the Cold War. P. 80.
336
Churchill W. Sinews of Peace. March 5, 1946. http://www.historyguide.org/europe/churchill.html.
337
Цит. по: Saunders Stonor F. The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters. New York, 1999. P. 58. См. также: Kirby D. Divinely Sanctioned: The Anglo-American Cold War Alliance and the Defence of Western Civilization and Christianity, 1945–1948 // Journal of Contemporary History. 2000. Vol. 35. № 3. P. 412.
338
Moyn S. From Communist to Muslim. P. 76.
339
Kirby D. The Religious Cold War // The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War / Eds. R. H. Immerman, P. Goedde. Oxford, 2013. P. 549.
340
Egerton G. Between War and Peace: Politics, Religion and Human Rights in Early Cold War Canada, 1945–1950 // Religion and the Cold War. P. 163.
341
Ibid.
342
United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.
343
Egerton G. Between War and Peace. P. 175.
344
Moyn S. From Communist to Muslim. P. 76.
345
Ibid. P. 77.
346
Ibid. P. 65, 77.
347
Ibid. P. 72.
348
Kirby D. The Religious Cold War. P. 549.
349
Ibid. P. 549–550.
350
Plummer B. G. Race and the Cold War // The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War. P. 503.
351
Ibid.
352
Цит. по: Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 55.
353
Kirby D. The Religious Cold War. P. 552. См. также: Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 109.
354
Kirby D. The Religious Cold War. P. 553.
355
Huntington S. P. Democracy’s Third Wave // Journal of Democracy. Spring 1993. P. 13.
356
Waldman P., Pope H. Updated «Crusade» Reference Reinforces Fears War on Terrorism Is against Muslims // Wall Street Journal online. September, 21, 2001. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1001020294332922160.
357
Цит. по: Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 14.
358
Цит. по: Fassin E. National Identities and Transnational Intimacies: Sexual Democracy and the Politics of Immigration in Europe // Public Culture. 2010. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 513.
359
Ibid. P. 521.
360
German Chancellor Angela Merkel: NWO Has Failed, Germany Returning to Its Christian Roots! // Politicalvelcraft.org. October 18, 2010. https://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/10/18/german-chancellor-angela-merkel-nwo-has-failed-germany-returning-to-its-christian-roots.
361
Ratzinger J., Habermas J. The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. San Francisco, 2007.
362
Habermas J. Time of Transitions. Cambridge, 2006. P. 150–151.
363
Pope Benedict XVI. Regensburg address. September 12, 2006 // Zenit.org. https://zenit.org/articles/papal-address-at-university-of-regensburg/.
364
Friedman G. A Net Assessment of the Middle East // Geopolitical Weekly. 2015. June 9.
365
Salisbury H. E. Nixon and Khrushchev Argue in Public as U. S. Exhibit Opens; Accuse Each Other of Threats // New York Times. 1959. July 24.
366
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. New York, 2008. P. 13.
367
Vicedo M. The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America. Chicago, 2014. P. 80.
368
Laville H. Gender and Women’s Rights in the Cold War // The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War. P. 531.
369
Ibid. Р. 530. Еще одним полем сражения, конечно, была раса. См.: Saunders Stonor F. The Cultural Cold War. P. 20.
370
Gal S., Kligman G. The Politics of Gender after Socialism. Princeton, 2000. См.: Donert C. Women’s Rights in Cold War Europe: Disentangling Feminist Histories // Past and Present. Supplement. 2013. № 8. P. 178–202.
371
Цит. по: Laville H. Gender and Women’s Rights. P. 530.
372
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound. P. 22.
373
Ibid. P. 132.
374
de Haan F. Continuing Cold War Paradigms in Western Historiography of Transnational Women’s Organizations: The Case of the Women’s International Democratic Federation (WIDF) // Women’s History Review. Vol. 19. № 4. 2010. P. 547–573.
375
Цит. по: Weigand K. The Red Menace: The Feminine Mystique and Ohio Un-American Activities Commission // Journal of Women’s History. 1992. № 3. P. 71.
376
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound. P. 91.
377
Ibid. P. 95.
378
Rosenberg E. Foreign Affairs after WWII // Diplomatic History. 1994. № 18. P. 68.
379
Ibid. P. 70.
380
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound. P. 99.
381
Herzog D. Sexuality in Europe: A Twentieth-Century History. Cambridge, 2011. P. 106.
382
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound. P. 142.
383
Ibid. P. 142–143.
384
Herzog D. Sexuality in Europe. P. 107, 137–139.
385
Olcott J. Cold War Conflicts and Cheap Cabaret: Sexual Politics at the 1975 United Nations International Women’s Year Conference // Gender and History. 2010. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 733–754.
386
Bock G. Poverty and Mothers’ Rights in the Emerging Welfare States // A History of Women in the West. 1994. Vol. 5. P. 405.
387
McIntosh A. C., Finkle J. L. The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: A New Paradigm? // Population and Development Review. 1995. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 227.
388
Moyn S. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, 2010. P. 12.
389
Ghodsee K. Revisiting the United Nations Decade for Women: Brief Reflections on Feminism, Capitalism and Cold War Politics in the Early Years of the International Women’s Movement // Women’s Studies International Forum. 2010. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 3–12.
390
Herzog D. Sexuality in Europe. P. 1–3.
391
Zaretsky E. Capitalism, the Family, and Personal Life. New York, 1976.
392
Herzog D. Sexuality in Europe. P. 133.
393
Ibid. P. 146.
394
Kinsey A. C. et al. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. Bloomington, 1998.
395
Global Feminisms since 1945: A Survey of Issues and Controversies / Ed. B. Smith. New York, 2000; Rosen R. The World Split Open: How the Modern Women’s Movement Changed America. New York, 2006; Holmstrom N. The Socialist Feminist Project: A Contemporary Reader in Theory and Politics. New York, 2004; Faderman L. The Gay Revolution: The Story of the Struggle. New York, 2015.
396
Snitow A., Stansell C., Thompson S. Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality. New York, 1983. P. 41.
397
MacKinnon C. A. Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory // Feminism and Sexuality: A Reader / Eds. Jackson S., McIntosh M. New York, 1996. P. 182–190.
398
Wittig M. One Is Not Born a Woman // The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism / Ed. V. B. Letich. New York: W. W. Norton, 2010.
399
Firestone S. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Bantam, 1970.
400
Spector J. Prostitution and Pornography: Philosophical Debate about the Sex Industry. Stanford, 2006.
401
Conflicts in Feminism / Eds. M. Hirsch, E. Keller Fox. New York, 1990.
402
Хороший обзор приведен в: Feminist Perspectives on Class and Work. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy online. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-class/.
403
Snitow et al. Powers of Desire. P. 35.
404
Ibid. P. 41–42.
405
Martin E. The End of the Body? // American Ethnologist. 1992. P. 121.
406
Sabsay L. The Emergence of the Other Sexual Citizen. P. 608.
407
Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 217.
408
Sabsay L. The Emergence of the Other Sexual Citizen. P. 610.
409
Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 132–133.
410
Bernstein E. Introduction: Sexual Economies and New Regimes of Governance // Social Politics. 2014. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 345–354. См. также: Bernstein E. Brokered Subjects: Sex, Trafficking, and the Politics of Freedom. Chicago, 2017.
411
Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 145.
412
Grewal I. Transnational America. Durham, 2005. P. 157. См. также обсуждение этих вопросов в: Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 135–145.
413
Fassin E. National Identities and Transnational Intimacies. P. 513.
414
Goven J. Gender Politics in Hungary: Autonomy and Antifeminism // Gender Politics and Post-Communism: Reflections from Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union / Eds. N. Funk, M. Mueller. New York, 1993. P. 227.
415
Gal S., Kligman G. The Politics of Gender. P. 69.
416
Kuhar R. Playing with Science: Sexual Citizenship and the Roman Catholic Counter-Narratives in Slovenia and Croatia // Women’s Studies International Forum online. August 14, 2014.
417
Gal S., Kligman G. The Politics of Gender. P. 29.
418
Ibid. P. 69.
419
Ibid.
420
Fabian K. Contemporary Women’s Movements in Hungary: Globalization, Democracy, and Gender Equality. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.
421
См. важную работу на эту тему: Cirstocea I. La fin du Deuxième Monde et la seconde vie de la femme rouge: Sociologie politique des constructions transnationales du genre en contexte postsocialiste // Mémoire de Recherche Original, Dossier pour l’habilitation à diriger des recherches. Université du Paris 1, Panthéon Sorbonne, January 2017.
422
Harsanyi D. P. Women in Romania // Gender Politics and Post-Communism / Eds. N. Funk, M. Mueller. P. 49.
423
Hauser E., Heyns B., Mansbridge J. Feminism in the Interstices of Politics and Culture: Poland in Transition // Gender Politics and Post-Communism. P. 267.
424
Drakulic S. Women and the New Democracy in the Former Yugoslavia // Gender Politics and Post-Communism. P. 127.
425
Dölling I. «But the Pictures Stay the Same…» The Image of Women in the Journal Für Dich before and after the «Turning Point» // Gender Politics and Post-Communism. P. 177.
426
Lissyutkina L. Soviet Women at the Crossroads of Perestroika // Gender Politics and Post-Communism. P. 284.
427
Waters E. Finding a Voice: The Emergence of a Women’s Movement, Interview with Anastasya Posadskaya and Valentina Konstantinova of the Center for Gender Studies in Moscow // Gender Politics and Post-Communism / Ed. N. Funk, M. Mueller. P. 295.
428
Ibid. P. 296–297.
429
Goven J. Gender Politics in Hungary // Ibid. P. 224–240.
430
Gal S., Kligman G. The Politics of Gender. P. 83.
431
См. широкую дискуссию с участием множества ученых, организованную Франсиской де Хаан: Ten Years After: Communism and Feminism Revisited // Aspasia. 2016. № 10. P. 102–168.
432
Le Nouvel observateur. 1989. November 2.
433
Inglehart R., Norris P. The True Clash of Civilizations. P. 65.
434
Ibid. P. 68.
435
Nussbaum M. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, 2001. P. 78–79.
436
Цит. по: Fernando M. The Republic Unsettled: Muslim French and the Contradictions of Secularism. Durham, 2014. P. 210.
437
Ibid.
438
Ibid. P. 211.
439
См., например: Bilefsky D. Ordered to Wear Heels, She Ignited a Rebellion // New York Times. 2017. January 26. P. A9.
440
Eisenstein H. Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women’s Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World. Boulder, 2009. P. viii — ix.
441
Sarkozy N. Convention sur l’immigration — Une immigration choisie, une intégration réussie. Выступление на съезде «Союза за народное движение» (UMP) 9 июня 2005. Я благодарна за эту ссылку Эрику Фоссену. См. также: Fassin E. La démocratie sexuelle et le conflit des civilisations // Multitudes. 2006. № 26. P. 123–131.
442
Siddiqi D. M. Solidarity, Sexuality and Saving Muslim Women in Neoliberal Times // Women’s Studies Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 42. № 3–4. P. 292–306. См. статью об этой рекламе: www.elle.com/news/culture/american-apparel-bangladesh-ad. Похожий аргумент о приравнивании обнаженного женского тела к сексуальному освобождению приводят двое ученых, разбиравших фильм Айаана Хирси Али «Подчинение» (снятого вместе с Тео ван Гогом): «Женская нагота означает права независимой женщины на тело» — даже если это тело выставляется для того, чтобы его увидели мужчины (Leeuw M. de, Wichelen S. van. Please, Go Wake Up: Submission, Hirsi Ali and the «War on Terror» in the Netherlands // Feminist Media Studies. 2005. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 332).
443
Fassin E. National Identities and Transnational Intimacies: Sexual Democracy and the Politics of Immigration in Europe // Public Culture. 2010. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 513.
444
Norton A. On the Muslim Question. Princeton, 2013.
445
Foucault M. The Confession of the Flesh // Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York, 1970. P. 219.
446
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 204–205.
447
Там же. С. 122.
448
Там же. С. 251.
449
Foucault M. History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books, 1980. Vol. 1. P. 103.
450
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 265–266.
451
Foucault M. The Confession of the Flesh. P. 220.
452
См., например: Bernstein E. The Sexual Politics of the «New Abolitionism» // Differences. 2007. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 128–151 и Temporarily Yours: Intimacy, Authenticity, and the Commerce of Sex. Chicago, 2007; Herzog D. Sex in Crisis: The New Sexual Revolution and the Future of American Politics. New York, 2008; Vance C. S. States of Contradiction: Twelve Ways to Do Nothing about Trafficking while Pretending to // Social Research. 2011. Vol. 78. № 3. P. 933–945; Innocence and Experience: Melodramatic Narratives of Sex Trafficking and Their Consequences for Law and Policy // History of the Present. 2012. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 200–218.
453
Schulman S. Israel and «Pinkwashing» // New York Times. 2011. November 22.
454
Norton A. On the Muslim Question. P. 57.
455
Mahmood S. The Politics of Piety. Princeton, 2004. P. 17. Классической работой в данном случае является: Батлер Дж. Психика власти: теории субъекции. СПб., 2002.
456
Ibid. P. 32.
457
Ibid. P. 28.
458
Göle N. Manifestations of the Religious-Secular Divide: Self-State and the Public Sphere // Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age / Eds. E. L. Cady, E. Hurd Shakman. New York, 2010. P. 49–50.
459
Ibid. P. 48.
460
Ibid. P. 49.
461
Ibid. P. 50.
462
Farris S. Femonationalism and the «Regular» Army of Labor Called Migrant Women // History of the Present. 2012. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 196.
463
Chasin A. Selling Out: The Gay and Lesbian Movement Goes to Market. New York, 2000; Harvey D. Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2007. № 610. P. 31. См. также: Rofel L. Desiring China: Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality, and Public Culture. Durham, 2007.
464
Kordela A. K. (Psychoanalytic) Biopolitics and Bioracism // Umbr(a). 2011. P. 19. См. также ее Consent beyond Ideology: (Marxian-Psychoanalytic) Biopolitics // Differences. 2013. Vol. 24. № 1.
465
Ibid.
466
Цит. по: Benbassa E. The Jews of France: A History from Antiquity to the Present. Princeton, 1999. P. 81.
467
Norton A. On the Muslim Question. Princeton, 2013. P. 171.
468
Brown W. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, 1995. P. 133–134.
469
Hartman S. V. Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. New York, 1997. P. 6.
470
Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer.
471
Hirsi Ali A. Infidel. New York, 2007.
472
Цит. по: Deltombe T. L’ Islam imaginaire: La construction médiatique de l’Islamophobie en France, 1975–2005. Paris, 2005. Жак Ширак цит. по: Deltombe T. Ibid. P. 347.
473
Vigerie A., Zelensky A. Laïcardes’ pusique féministes // Pro-Choix. 2003. № 25. P. 12.
474
Маркс К. К еврейскому вопросу // Маркс К. Сочинения: В 30 т. М., 1955. Т. 1. С. 386.
475
The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. New York, 1971. Vol. 1. P. 848.
476
Ibid.
477
Hartman S. V. Scenes of Subjection. P. 57.
478
Маркс К. К еврейскому вопросу. С. 390.
479
Там же.
480
Маркс К. Капитал // Сочинения. Т. 23. С. 69.
481
Brown W. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, 2015.
482
Ibid.
483
Deci E., Ryan R. eds., Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2002.
484
Lloyd K. The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. Minneapolis, 2009.
485
Zaretsky E. Capitalism, the Family, and Personal Life. New York, 1976. P. 111.
486
Фуко М. Безопасность, территория, население: Курс лекций, прочитанный в Коллеж де Франс (1977–1978). СПб., 2011. С. 87–88.
487
Zelizer V. A. The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton, 2005.
488
Norton A. On the Muslim Question. P. 56.
489
Классическое исследование в данном случае, естественно: Батлер Дж. Гендерное беспокойство. М., 2022.
490
Scott Wallach J. The Veil and the Political Unconscious of French Republicanism // Orient XXI. 2016. April 27.