, “An Icon for a Modern Age”, in Malevich, ed. Achim Borchardt-Hume, London, Tate Publishing, 2014, pp. 28-29
[The late works] are considered to be innovative and a continuation of the Suprematist enterprise, and even to represent a new phase of Suprematism.
PROF. CHRISTINA LODDER, President of the Malevich Society
Portrait of E. Yakovleva, 1932
Portrait of Nikolai Punin, 1933
Suprematist Composition, c. 1919-1920
Mystic Suprematism (red cross on black circle), 1920-1922
The crucial example with which to conclude a consideration of various guises and shades of suprematism with the still-enigmatic late figurative works of Malevich's so- called 'Second Peasant Cycle' from the late 1920s and early 1930s, and the role and the function of color therein. These range from overly emphatic bands of pure color in works such as Head of a Peasant 1928-9 (illustrated on page 207 of the catalog), with blocks of red and green gesturing towards the furrow of a ploughed field, or the striated bands of pure color that act as horizon lines in Running Man 1930-1 (Centre Pompidou, Paris) and Three Female Figures c. 1930 (illustrated on page 212 of the catalog), through to the seemingly more orthodox figurative paintings such as Portrait of E. Yakolevna of 1932 (illustrated on page 120 of the catalog). In all of these, it is color that effects a rapprochement between the compositional norms of suprematism and the conflicting demands of figuration. The bold bands of red and green that adorn the coat collar of the sitter in Portrait of E. Yakolevna, or the red of her strangely quadrangular purse — both of which are strikingly at odds with the naturalism of this portrait — are perhaps a form of encoded or suppressed suprematism, and one that suggests itself precisely through these geometrical blocks of solid color. In this poignant painting we come full circle from the Black Square, from color being sublimated in order to heighten the dramatic impact of the birth of suprematism, to color being one of the few ways in which Malevich could tacitly allude to the innovations he had pioneered ad that were now themselves suppressed. Here, by once again 'pouring color into squares', as Matyushin had characterized (or caricatured) the paintings from the 0.10 exhibition, Malevich ingeniously used color to infuse his figurative paintings with the pioneering developments of his suprematist period, which here becomes an adornment or badge of honor that effects a rapprochement between the aesthetics of both.
Nicholas Cullinan, “Color Masses”, in Malevich, ed. Achim Borchardt-Hume, London, Tate Publishing, 2014, p. 121
UNA URIMAN: ABOUT E. YAKOVLEVA
Elizaveta Iakovleva, painter and theater artist, studied in St. Petersburg at the studio of Mikhail Bernshtein with Boris Anisfeld and Leonid Shervud. She worked for the Bolshoi Dramatic Theater and he Theater of Musical Comedy in Leningrad as a costume and set designer. She took part in the Theatrical and Decorative Arts 1917-27 exhibition in Leningrad in 1927. In the early 1930s Malevich painted her portrait (Nakov, Cat. Raisonne, p. 403, PS-253)
Una, Malevich's daughter, recounts her memories of E. Yakovleva recorded by Nina Suetina, and transcribed and annotated by Irina Vakar as follows:
In 1932 Papa took me to live with him in Leningrad. […] Every evening guest gathered at Papa's, there were always ten to twelve people sitting at the table. […] Of those who visited Papa's apartment I remember: Anna Alexandrovna, Nikolai Mikhailovich, Konstantin Ivanovich, Elizaveta Iakovleva* — she was a small- time painter, she kept coming every day, and they loved her at our place.
Una Uriman, “About my Father” in Kazimir Malevich. Letters, Documents, Memoirs, Criticism, Volume 2, Kazimir Malevich: Memoirs and Criticism, eds. Irina A. Vakar and Tatiana N. Mikhienko, London, Tate Publishing 2015, p. 31
PROF. CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS: AVANT-GARDE RUSSIAN TEXTILE DESIGN
World War I, the two revolutions, and the civil war did not disrupt the pace of innovation in Russian fabric design. Under new slogans of revolution, internationalism, and classlessness, Suprematist and Constructivist design continued until the late 1920s, when geometric design — on clothing or any other fabric — became politically suspect, and was forced out by a younger generation of artists.
Suprematist design then acquired an even greater importance for Malevich. In his late portraits it has emblematic, philosophical, and even counterrevolutionary significance. In 1934 Malevich painted a splendid portrait of the Leningrad theater designer Elizaveta Iakovleva (illustrated on the same page of the journal as this text.). Dressed in a cadmium yellow hat and a coat with a Suprematist collar, she slyly exhibits a bright red Suprematist handbag. This painting has recently been discovered. Most of the actual fabric and other articles have been lost or destroyed. We must be grateful indeed for Sayler's photographs.
Charlotte Douglas, “Suprematist Embroided Ornament,” in Art Journal, Vol. 54 No. 1, Spring1995, p. 45
Portrait of E. Yakovleva, detail handbag
Olga Rozanova, appliqued handbag, 1916–1917
Symbolism is unquestionably the foundation of his aesthetics.
DR. ANDREI NAKOV, Specialist Russian Avant-Garde
Portrait of E. Yakovleva, collar details
Sketches of costumes for the opera Victory Over the Sun by M. Matyushin and A. Kruchenykh, 1913, details
TRANSLATION STEDELIJK MUSEUM LETTER
4 November 2015
Subject:
Purchase of artwork by Malevich
With the present letter we, as the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam, hereby state our serious interest in purchasing the work by Kazimir Malevich, Portrait of E. Yakolevna from 1932, which you are the owner of.
We have taken note of the first discussions of pricing and given that the amount mentioned by you exceeds 20 million euros, it is an ambitious amount for the Stedelijk to bring together. It should therefore be noted that we, in order to be entitled to such funds, need a valuation report from an officially recognized art appraiser.
We are determined to take up the challenge of acquiring this work because we see this as a unique opportunity to complement our existing collection of Malevich works.
We hereby rely on our shared responsibility of writing art history wherein, as often shown in the distant and recent past, the public domain is dependent on private ownership.
The Stedelijk has in its collection a number of key-works by Malevich from this very enigmatic stylistic development of his oeuvre. With Bather we own an icon from his fauvist — primitive period. Woodcutter is a masterwork from his cubo-futurist period and Englishman in Moscow belongs to the top works from his a-logic phase.
Our collection has the strongest representation of geometric abstract works of Malevich in the world: from the Suprematist works (including 5 (!) from the O.lOexhibition), to the most cosmic oriented abstract works that herald the transition to the “Architectons“ with the crosses, the floating yellow plane and the three thin white abstracts. This is a unique ensemble of paintings brought together by Malevich in an exhibition in Berlin (1926) to show the world his artistic developments that he thought would conquer the European art world.
We although know better by now.
Malevich got stuck because in the political conditions of the late 1920s and returned to Russia, never to come back to the West. But this certainly did not mean the end of his artistic development. Back in Russia under the harsh conditions of a dictatorship that wanted to also dictate the artistic developments, he returned to the figurative.
Intentionally or not, he produced one of the most mysterious twists ever in the oeuvre of an artist. Almost all examples of this late period are to be found in Russian collections and are therefore a rarity in the West.
We experience the lack of a painting from this period — as in the Khardzhiev Collection that is managed by us there are many drawings from this time- as a very great loss. In order to be able to tell the story of one of the most beautiful oeuvres of the twentieth century on the wails of our museum, we want to uo everything possible to accomplish the acquisitions oi Portrait of E. Yakolevna. The intention is not only to acquire “an example of a late work” but in our eyes an equally strong icon from this missed period just as the aforementioned masterworks that represent the different stylistic periods.
To our knowledge, the painting Portrait of E. Yakolevna has first been illustrated in the groundbreaking article Suprematist Embroidered Ornament by Malevich specialist Charlotte Douglas in the American magazine The Art Journal, spring 1995, p. 45.
The work is included in the catalog raisonne by Andrei Nakov on the oeuvre of Malevich from 2002 (PS-253, p. 403). While in several portraits from this period Suprematist details appear in the clothing of the portrayed characters, the portrait of E. Yakolevna stands out because the sitter draws attention to the object in her right hand (seen by the onlooker), which is described as a Suprematistic handbag.
For Charlotte Douglas this object was the reason for illustrating the painting, as her article explains that Malevich had already shown two Suprematist shawls and a cushion in the well known 0:10 exhibition from 15 December in Petrograd. He showed for the first time in public his Suprematist paintings already in November 1915 in Moscow, in an exhibition of modern decorative art in the K. Lemercier Gallery.