Стихи и эссе — страница 42 из 149

     But it seems idle to discuss

     If anger or compassion leaves

     The bigger bangs to us.

     What reverence is rightly paid

     To a Divinity so odd

     He lets the Adam whom He made

     Perform the Acts of God?

     It might be jolly if we felt

     Awe at this Universal Man

     (When kings were local, people knelt);

     Some try to, but who can?

     The self-observed observing Mind

     We meet when we observe at all

     Is not alariming or unkind

     But utterly banal.

     Though instruments at Its command

     Make wish and counterwish come true,

     It clearly cannot understand

     What It can clearly do.

     Since the analogies are rot

     Our senses based belief upon,

     We have no means of learning what

     Is really going on,

     And must put up with having learned

     All proofs or disproofs that we tender

     Of His existence are returned

     Unopened to the sender.

     Now, did He really break the seal

     And rise again? We dare not say;

     But conscious unbelievers feel

     Quite sure of Judgement Day.

     Meanwhile, a silence on the cross,

     As dead as we shall ever be,

     Speaks of some total gain or loss,

     And you and I are free

     To guess from the insulted face

     Just what Appearances He saves

     By suffering in a public place

     A death reserved for slaves.

1958

Thanksgiving for a Habitat

     Nobody I know would like to be buried

     with a silver cocktail-shaker,

     a transistor radio and a strangled

     daily help, or keep his word because

     of a great-great-grandmother who got laid

     by a sacred beast. Only a press lord

     could have built San Simeon: no unearned income

     can buy us back the gait and gestures

     to manage a baroque staircase, or the art

     of believing footmen don't hear

     human speech. (In adulterine castles

     our half-strong might hang their jackets

     while mending their lethal bicycle-chains:

     luckily, there are not enough

     crags to go round.) Still, Hetty Pegler's Tump

     is worth a visit, so is Schönbrunn,

     to look at someone's idea of the body

     that should have been his, as the flesh

     Mum formulated shouldn't: that whatever

     he does or feels in the mood for,

     stock-taking, horse-play, worship, making love,

     he stays the same shape, disgraces

     a Royal I. To be over-admired is not

     good enough: although a fine figure

     is rare in either sex, others like it

     have existed before. One may

     be a Proustian snob or a sound Jacksonian

     democrat, but which of us wants

     to be touched inadvertently, even

     by his beloved? We know all about graphs

     and Darwin, enormous rooms no longer

     superhumanise, but earnest

     city-planners are mistaken: a pen

     for a rational animal

     is no fitting habitat for Adam's

     sovereign clone. I, a transplant

     from overseas, at last am dominant

     over three acres and a blooming

     conurbation of country lives, few of whom

     I shall ever meet, and with fewer

     converse. Linnaeus recoiled from the Amphibia

     as a naked gruesome rabble,

     Arachnids give me the shudders, but fools

     who deface their emblem of guilt

     are germane to Hitler: the race of spiders

     shall be allowed their webs. I should like

     to be to my water-brethren as a spell

     of fine weather: Many are stupid,

     and some, maybe, are heartless, but who is not

     vulnerable, easy to scare,

     and jealous of his privacy? (I am glad

     the blackbird, for instance, cannot

     tell if I'm talking English, German or

     just typewriting: that what he utters

     I may enjoy as an alien rigmarole.) I ought

     to outlast the limber dragonflies

     as the muscle-bound firs are certainly

     going to outlast me: I shall not end

     down any oesophagus, though I may succumb

     to a filter-passing predator,

     shall, anyhow, stop eating, surrender my smidge

     of nitrogen to the World Fund

     with a drawn-out Oh (unless at the nod

     of some jittery commander

     I be translated in a nano-second

     to a c.c. of poisonous nothing

     in a giga-death). Should conventional

     blunderbuss war and its routiers

     invest my bailiwick, I shall of course

     assume the submissive posture:

     but men are not wolves and it probably

     won't help. Territory, status,

     and love, sing all the birds, are what matter:

     what I dared not hope or fight for

     is, in my fifties, mine, a toft-and-croft

     where I needn't, ever, be at home to

     those I am not at home with, not a cradle,

     a magic Eden without clocks,

     and not a windowless grave, but a place

     I may go both in and out of.

1962

The Common Life

(for Chester Kallman)

     A living-room, the catholic area you

     (Thou, rather) and I may enter

     without knocking, leave without a bow, confronts

     each visitor with a style,

     a secular faith: he compares its dogmas

     with his, and decides whether

     he would like to see more of us. (Spotless rooms

     where nothing's left lying about

     chill me, so do cups used for ash-trays or smeared

     with lip-stick: the homes I warm to,

     though seldom wealthy, always convey a feeling

     of bills being promptly settled

     with cheques that don't bounce.) There's no We at an instant,

     only Thou and I, two regions

     of protestant being which nowhere overlap:

     a room is too small, therefore,

     if its occupants cannot forget at will

     that they are not alone, too big

     if it gives them any excuse in a quarrel

     for raising their voices. What,

     quizzing ours, would Sherlock Holmes infer? Plainly,

     ours is a sitting culture

     in a generation which prefers comfort

     (or is forced to prefer it)

     to command, would rather incline its buttocks

     on a well-upholstered chair

     than the burly back of a slave: a quick glance

     at book-titles would tell him

     that we belong to the clerisy and spend much

     on our food. But could he read

     what our prayers and jokes are about, what creatures

     frighten us most, or what names

     head our roll-call of persons we would least like

     to go to bed with? What draws

     singular lives together in the first place,

     loneliness, lust, ambition,

     or mere convenience, is obvious, why they drop

     or murder one another

     clear enough: how they create, though, a common world

     between them, like Bombelli's

     impossible yet useful numbers, no one

     has yet explained. Still, they do

     manage to forgive impossible behavior,

     to endure by some miracle

     conversational tics and larval habits

     without wincing (were you to die,

     I should miss yours). It's a wonder that neither

     has been butchered by accident,

     or, as lots have, silently vanished into

     History's criminal noise

     unmourned for, but that, after twenty-four years,

     we should sit here in Austria

     as cater-cousins, under the glassy look

     of a Naples Bambino,

     the portrayed regards of Strauss and Stravinsky,

     doing British cross-word puzzles,

     is very odd indeed. I'm glad the builder gave

     our common-room small windows

     through which no observed outsider can observe us:

     every home should be a fortress,

     equipped with all the very latest engines

     for keeping Nature at bay,

     versed in all ancient magic, the arts of quelling

     the Dark Lord and his hungry

     animivorous chimaeras. (Any brute