Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Apr. 1994, Vol. 62(2), 221–227.
27 Blanchard R. Fraternal birth order and the maternal immune hypothesis of male homosexuality // Hormones and Behavior, Sep. 2001, Vol. 40, Issue 2, 105–114.
28 Savic I. and Lindstrom P. PET and MRI show differences in cerebral asymmetry and functional connectivity between homo– and heterosexual subjects // PNAS, July 2008, Vol. 105, No. 27, 9403–9408.
29 Berglund H. et al. Brain response to putative phero-mones in lesbian women // PNAS, May 2006, Vol. 103(21): 8269–8274.
30 American Psychological Association, 2005. Lesbian and Gay Parenting. Отчет доступен по ссылке: http://www.apa.org/ pi/lgbt/resources/parenting-full.pdf
31 Rosenfeld M. Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school // Demography, Aug. 2010, Vol. 47(3), 755–775.
32 Gates G. et al. Adoption and Foster Care by Gay and Lesbian Parents in the United States. The Urban Institute; Washington, DC: 2007. Отчет доступен по ссылке: http:// williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-Badgett-Macomber-Chambers-Final-Adoption-Report-Mar-2007.pdf
33 Regnerus M. How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study // Social Science Research, 2012, Vol. 41, 752–770.
34 Marina S. et al. Sharing motherhood: biological lesbian co-mothers, a new IVF indication // Human Reproduction, Apr. 2010, Vol. 25, Issue 4, 938–941.
35 Kono T. et al. Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood // Nature, Apr. 2004, Vol. 428, 860–864.
36 Deng J. M. et al. Generation of Viable Male and Female Mice from Tw o Fathers // Biology of Reproduction, 2011 Mar., Vol. 84(3), 613–618.
37 Wilkins J & Haig D. What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specifc gene expression // Nature Reviews Genetics, May 2003, Vo l. 4, 359–368.
1 Windhager S. et al. Face to face. The perception of automotive designs // Human Nature, 2008 Dec., Vol. 19(4), 331–346.
2 Windhager S. et al. «Cars have their own faces»: cross-cultural ratings of car shapes in biological (stereotypical) terms // Evolution & Human Behavior, Mar. 2012, Vol. 33, Issue 2, 109–120.
3 Bateson M. et al. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting // Biology. Letters, Sep. 2006, Vol. 22, Issue 2(3), 412–414.
4 Rigdon M. et al. Minimal social cues in the dictator game // Journal of Economic Psychology, June 2009, Vol. 30, Issue 3, 358–367.
5 Bekkers R. and Schuyt T. And who is your neighbor? Explaining denominational differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the Netherlands // Review of Religious Research, Sep. 2008, Vol. 50, No. 1, 74–96.
6 Wang L. and Graddy E. Social capital, volunteering, and charitable giving // International Journal of Voluntary and Nonproft Organizations, Mar. 2008, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 23–42.
7 Bekkers R. Measuring altruistic behavior in surveys: the all-or-nothing dictator game // Survey Research Methods, 2007, Vol. 1, No. 3, 139–144.
8 Malhotra D. (When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the «Sunday Effect» on pro-social behavior // Judgment and Decision Making, April 2010, Vol. 5, No. 2, 138–143.
9 Shariff A. and Norenzayan A. God is watching you. Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game // Psychological Science, 2007 Sep., Vol. 18(9), 803–809.
10 Sosis R. and Bressler E. Cooperation and commune longevity: a test of the costly signaling theory of religion // Cross-Cultural Research, May 2003, Vol. 37, No. 2, 211–239.
11 Ginges J. et al. Religion and support for suicide attacks // Psychological Science, Feb. 2009, Vol. 20, No. 2, 224–230.
12 Blogowska J. et al. Religious prosociality and aggression: it’s real // Journal for the Scientifc Study of Religion, Sep. 2013, Vol. 52, Issue 3, 524–536.
13 Bartal I. et al. Helping a cagemate in need: empathy and pro-social behavior in rats // Science, Dec. 2011, Vol. 9; No. 334(6061), 1427–1430.
14 Langford D. et al. Social modulation of pain as evidence for empathy in mice // Science, June 2006, Vol. 312, No. 5782, 1967–1970.
15 Brosnan S. and de Waal F. Monkeys reject unequal pay // Nature, Sep. 2003, Vol. 425, 297–299.
16 Hamlin K. and Wynn K. Young infants prefer proso-cial to antisocial others // Cognitive Development, Jan. 2011; Vol. 26(1), 30–39.
17 Hamlin K. et al. How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others // PNAS, Dec. 2011, Vol. 108, No. 50, 19931–19936.
18 Hamlin K. et al. Not like me = bad: Infants prefer those who harm dissimilar others // Psychological Science, Apr. 2013; Vol. 24(4), 589–594.
19 Silveira L. Experimenting with spirituality: analyzing the God Gene in a nonmajors laboratory course // CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Spring; 7(1): 132–145.
20 St-Pierre L. and Persinger M. Experimental facilitation of the sensed presence is predicted by the specifc patterns of the applied magnetic felds, not by suggestibility: Re-analyses of 19 experiments // International Journal of Neuroscience, 116: 1079–1096, 2006.
21 Persinger M. The neuropsychiatry of paranormal experiences // Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2001 Fall; 13(4): 515–524.
22 Granqvist P. et al. Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak complex magnetic felds // Neuroscience Letters, 2005 Apr 29;379(1): 1–6.
23 Tinoco C. and Ortiz J. Magnetic stimulation of the temporal cortex: A partial «God Helmet» replication study // Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research, April 2014, Vol. 5, Issue 3, 234–257.
24 Devinsky O. and Lai G. Spirituality and religion in epilepsy // Epilepsy and Behavior, May 2008, Vol. 12, Issue 4, 636–643.
25 Pyysiäinen I. and Hauser M. The origins of religion: evolved adaptation or by-product? // Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Mar 2010, Vol. 14, Issue 3, 104–109.
26 Strayhorn J. M. and Strayhorn J. C. Religiosity and teen birth rate in the United States // Reproductive Health, Sep 2009, 6:14.
27 Stanger-Hall K., Hall D. Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: Why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S // PLoS One, Oct 2011; 6(10): e24658.
28 Paul G. The chronic dependence of popular religiosity upon dysfunctional psychosociological conditions // Evolutionary Psychology, 2009, Vol. 7, Issue 3, 398–441.
29 Gallup о религиозности американцев: http://www.gallup. com/poll/147887/americans-continue-believe-god.aspx
30 Попытка выяснить, сколько верующих в американских тюрьмах: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyathe-ist/2013/07/16/what-percentage-of-prisoners-are-atheists-its-a-lot-smaller-than-we-ever-imagined/
31 Ecklund E. and Scheitle C. Religion among academic scientists: distinctions, disciplines, and demographics // Social Problems, May 2007, Volume 54, Issue 2, 289–307.
32 Stirrat M. and Cornwell E. Eminent scientists reject the supernatural: A survey of the Fellows of the Royal Society // Evolution: Education and Outreach 2013, 6:33.
33 Zuckerman M. et al. The relation between intelligence and religiosity. A meta-analysis and some proposed explanations // Personality and Social Psychology Review, Nov 2013, Vol. 17, No. 4, 325–354.